Looks like the Q, W, A and Z keys came off and someone simply didn't pay
any attention when popping them back on.  If you look at the picture on the
original box, it appears to be a standard QWERTY keyboard depicted.

Ken

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Lee Kelley <[email protected]> wrote:

> It's not
>
> *Dvorak which is what I checked out being that I don't parlyvu fransay.
> lol*
> *On an other note if you set up a computer for **Dvorak and then remote
> controle into it from a computer that is not set for *
>
> *Dvorak it can be pretty confusing when you forget about it....*
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Mike Stein <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> AKA AZERTY
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> *From:* Geoffrey Oltmans <[email protected]>
>> *To:* Model 100 Discussion <[email protected]>
>> *Sent:* Friday, September 11, 2015 2:55 PM
>> *Subject:* Re: [M100] Keyboard Layout
>>
>> Looks like just a standard French keyboard layout.
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Kurt McCullum <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Saw this 102 today and other than being a French version, I noticed the
>>> keyboard layout was like nothing I had ever seen before. Is anybody
>>> familiar with this arrangement of keys?
>>>
>>> Ordinateur TANDY 102 avec boite BOXED computer
>>> <http://www.ebay.com/itm/Ordinateur-TANDY-102-avec-boite-BOXED-computer-/231683657494?hash=item35f16c0f16>
>>>
>>> [image: image]
>>> <http://www.ebay.com/itm/Ordinateur-TANDY-102-avec-boite-BOXED-computer-/231683657494?hash=item35f16c0f16>
>>>
>>> Ordinateur TANDY 102 avec boite BOXED computer
>>> <http://www.ebay.com/itm/Ordinateur-TANDY-102-avec-boite-BOXED-computer-/231683657494?hash=item35f16c0f16>
>>> US $67.34 Seller refurbished in Computers/Tablets & Networking, Vintage
>>> Computing, Other Vintage Computing
>>> View on www.ebay.com
>>> <http://www.ebay.com/itm/Ordinateur-TANDY-102-avec-boite-BOXED-computer-/231683657494?hash=item35f16c0f16>
>>> Preview by Yahoo
>>>
>>>
>>> Kurt
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *"I will never in my lifetime make a film that cannot be seen by the whole
> family"*  Arther P. Jacobs
>

Reply via email to