A couple of those look pretty good. maybe 2 possible ways to both preserve the original socket and still be able to socket the new eprom.
I just realized another reason for choosing to standardize on 27C256 (uv erase) and dip packging even though 28C256 would be a little more convenient, especially going forward, The main rom sockets in late m100's and all t102's can take a plain unadulerated 27C256 directly. On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:22 PM Mike Stein <[email protected]> wrote: > You mean these guys (all zero clearance): > > > http://www.ebay.ca/itm/50x-Batten-and-Allen-BA3760-Dil-Leadframe-DIP-PCB-Edge-Clip-Pins-BASIC-Stamp-/261518387239 > > Here they are shown in use: > > > http://www.dasarodesigns.com/product/mps-6550-commodore-pet-2001-ram-adapter/ > > For pins that can't be on the edge (as in the M100ROM) I use pins out of > component carriers like these with the tops cut off after soldering > (although short pieces of wire such as you cut off from resistors etc. work > just as well) : > > > http://www.king-cart.com/phoenixent/product=COMPONENT+CARRIER+HEADER+PLUGS+DIP+%2526+SIP/exact_match=exact > > Like this (the M100ROM being discussed elsewhere...): > > [image: ComboBas.JPG] > > m > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Stephen Adolph" <[email protected]> > To: "Model 100 Discussion" <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 2:33 PM > Subject: [M100] low profile pins > > > @Mike Stein > > Mike, can you repost those special pins that you found for > > edge-soldering to PCBs? very useful for the M100 socket problem. > > If I were worried about height compliance, I would not use pin > > headers, but use those pins instead. > > Steve >
