Ah, OK; we know that there are four 32KB ROM pages (plus one 32KB Option ROM 
slot); if the ROM0 socket is 32 pins then that (plus Kurt's reference) would 
suggest that everything is in one 27C1001 EPROM (with presumably a second 28 
pin socket for the Option ROM.)

Unfortunately at this time I don't have any 27C1001s or the means to program 
them easily, so I'm afraid I can't help after all; hopefully someone else can 
help out.

Sorry Fred,

m

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stephen Adolph" <[email protected]>
To: "Model 100 Discussion" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 5:52 PM
Subject: Re: [M100] Parts for an NEC PC-8300


> from my perspective-
> 
> * there is a single socket ROM0 for the main ROM
> * ROM1 is for option roms.
> * there is no other ROM in the unit.
> * it is a 32pin socket, and so it must be no larger than a 64kB rom.
> Not likely to be 32kB.
> * i'd bet that OUT163,2 sets A15 on the socket.
> * no idea what the pinout is but it could be deduced quickly. I think
> since the PC8201 uses normal pinouts, so too does the 8300.
> 
> So  my bet would be a 27C512 would do it.  It is possible however that
> it is still just a 32kB rom.  Perhaps OUT163,2 sets a signal on the
> PIO or otherwise that the processor can check, to decide what mode it
> should be in.
> 
> Steve
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Frederick Whitaker
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Mike
>>
>> There are places for two ROMS. In the regular PC-8300 there is only one ROM
>> used for Basic.
>>     83100 - 438
>>     N83A Basic
>>     1986
>>     Microsoft
>>     8649 - Z69
>>
>> In the other unit, which no longer has it's regular ROM, there are two ROMs
>>     D276256D-20
>>     D276256G-25
>>
>> I hope this helps. On the PC-8300 there is a wide access on the back with
>> three screws. Only two ROM sockets are visible and usable without
>> dismantling the case.
>>
>> I hope this helps.
>>
>> Fred Whitaker
>>
>>
>> On 2/17/2017 2:15 PM, Mike Stein wrote:
>>>
>>> Looks like it's up to you, Fred:
>>>
>>> Can you open up the 8300 and tell us exactly how many and what kind of
>>> ROMs or EPROMs are in there, i.e. any labels and/or part numbers?
>>>
>>> Since at least one is custom firmware it's probably in an EPROM (as
>>> opposed to a ROM) and will probably have a standard number like 27C512.
>>>
>>>  From what I've read it looks like there should be three 28-pin sockets
>>> with a 27C512 in two of them and the third one empty or with an Option ROM
>>> in it.
>>>
>>> Let me know what you find.
>>>
>>> m
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Fred Whitaker" <[email protected]>
>>> To: "Model 100 Discussion" <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2017 3:32 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Parts for an NEC PC-8300
>>>
>>>
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>> I don't have an image. I don't know if the ROM you are referring to will
>>>> do the job. The 8300 ROM is bigger than the 8201, but I believe it uses
>>>> the same chip as the 8201.
>>>>
>>>> I was under the impression that someone had uploaded a copy of the 8300
>>>> ROM contents, but I don't remember where or when.
>>>>
>>>> I could send you one of my ROMs, from another machine, but I don't know
>>>> if that would help.
>>>>
>>>> Fred Whitaker
>>>>
>>>> On 2/11/2017 7:48 PM, Mike Stein wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Frederick,
>>>>>
>>>>> If you can send me or point me to an image of that ROM I can probably
>>>>> burn an EPROM for you, assuming it's a JEDEC-standard 27xxx type.
>>>>>
>>>>> m
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Frederick Whitaker" <[email protected]>
>>>>> To: "Model 100 Discussion" <[email protected]>
>>>>> Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2017 6:27 PM
>>>>> Subject: [M100] Parts for an NEC PC-8300
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I am interested in a replacement keyboard for my NEC PC-8300. I also
>>>>>> need a new Main ROM, When I received this machine it had a specialized
>>>>>> ROM in it. It will not boot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If I had those two items I could use this machine. I have asked in the
>>>>>> past if anyone could make a main ROM for this machine but never
>>>>>> received
>>>>>> an answer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fred Whitaker
>>
>>

Reply via email to