...You could make a board where the chip is soldered on, and that
would fit in the original socket.  The problem then is, that chip
would not be re-programmable very easily, because the combined
chip-on-adapter creates a non-standard pinout that a programmer
doesn't support...

A pgming adapter sounds doable - And cheap...




On 8/23/17, Brian White <[email protected]> wrote:
> The problem is that the new adapter is too tall for the available space, if
> it's plugged in to the original socket.
>
> The reason it's too tall is because of the plcc socket. Through-hole style
> plcc sockets are pretty tall.
>
> The way that adapter works, you lose the ability to plug the original rom
> back in, but but the new rom is removable and rewriteable without any
> further special adapters. You just pop the bare chip out and it pops into a
> standard reader, with an adapter too, but a standard one that comes with
> the reader just to adapte the physical form, notrearrange pins into a
> special pinout.
>
> There are lots of possible work-arounds, but they all have some kind of
> down-side just like desoldering the original socket is a down-side.
>
> You could make a board where the chip is soldered on, and that would fit in
> the original socket.
>
> The problem then is, that chip would not be re-programmable very easily,
> because the combined chip-on-adapter creates a non-standard pinout that a
> programmer doesn't support.
>
> You would have to make a "reverse adapter" to ever reprogram later, or get
> a test-clip that clips righ onto the chip on the board.
>
> I *think* it should bebpossible to make an adapter that plugs in to the
> original dip socket and still has a plcc socket itself, by using a surface
> mount plcc socket instead of a throu-hole one. There is a figtronix option
> rom board that uses that. I have made a few and they work. But the
> down-side in *that* case is that a low profile surface mount plcc socket
> can only be soldered with an oven or hot air and paste. It's MUCH simpler
> to solder the through-hole kind for the average hobbyist. I have managed
> it, and did it using a cheap $20 hot air gun instead of a $60-$500 "real"
> hot air soldering station, but it was tricky and finnicky and not reliably
> reproduceable. I also botched it several times and had to keep starting
> over. (heat it all up enough to come off, clean off all solder, and start
> over very carefully applying new paste and flux and trying lay the socket
> in exactly the right position...)
>
> No mmatter which way you turn, there is either one problem, or some other
> problem.
>
> Mike Stein has a board that uses a full dip chip, and can plug in to the
> original socket, but I don't think it can accomodate a socket to make the
> new, standard 27C256 removable for reprogramming and still all fit in the
> case. If it can, that would be the way to go. Otherwise it's just one of
> many equally good-with-a-problem options.
>
> Remember, this is all only for M100's that have the original non-standard
> pinout main rom. Some late M100's and all T102's don't have any problem and
> don't need any adapter.
>
> --
> bkw
>
> On Aug 23, 2017 5:18 PM, "Gary Weber" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I have a question for anyone out there who has created a main ROM adapter
>> for their Model 100, using these parts and following these instructions:
>> http://tandy.wiki/FigTronix#Model_100_Main_ROM_27C256_PLCC_Adapter
>>
>> My question has to do with this statement:
>>    "Unfortunately, using this adapter requires desoldering the original
>> socket from the motherboard. It IS possible to do this, without damaging
>> either the motherboard or even the old socket, with flux, solder wick,
>> and
>> patience."
>>
>> I'm a little confused as to why the original socket would have to be
>> de-soldered.  Can't this adapter just be plugged into an empty CPU
>> socket?
>> Or is it the case that the M100 case can't close again because of
>> something
>> so high in that socket pressing against the keyboard circuit-board?
>>
>> Thanks for the info!
>>
>>
>> --
>> Gary Weber
>> [email protected]
>>
>

Reply via email to