Yes I did remove it.  It should not be built any more - it has known
defects.



On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Brian White <[email protected]> wrote:

> Awesome. Thank you. Would you be averse to me putting these and some other
> files that you've published into github?
>
> Hey did you remove the quad v4 pcb from oshpark?
>
> I built a set of quads last night and had a scratched up trace and
> possible short between a couple of legs on the AC74 and what looks like
> possibly some ground plane extended in between them. Sure enough in the
> end, the m100 doesn't start with that unit installed. So I went to look at
> the pcb drawing to see what the traces are supposed to be, and it's gone
> from oshpark now.
>
> The other 2 units worked, so the alternative flash chip works, at least
> for the mininal test to switch into all 4 banks and use a ur2 rom to load
> dos100.co to install 0quad in all 4 banks. That must excercise about 7 or
> 8k in each bank briefly, since dos100.co is almost 6k.
>
> --
> bkw
>
> On Nov 5, 2017 9:53 AM, "Stephen Adolph" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> T200 RAM PCB files are in my personal directory at Club 100.
>> cheers
>> Steve
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Brian White <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Doesn't matter to me. Might as well continue using club100 at least for
>>> now I guess.
>>>
>>> I just built another 2 boards and all in all the existing method isn't
>>> too bad as long as you aren't trying to produce them in numbers.
>>>
>>> I found an easier way to extract the pins than pulling with pliars. By
>>> cracking open the insulator with cutters, cutting in-line with the pin.
>>> They popped loose pretty easy. It's actually a pretty neat hack you found
>>> there. The end resulting leg is tidy.
>>>
>>> Thanks again for providing this.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> bkw
>>>
>>> On Nov 4, 2017 5:58 PM, "Stephen Adolph" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Not at all.  I did it back in the day because it was clearly doable and
>>>> worthwhile..efforts to improve it are great!  Where should the source eagle
>>>> files go?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Saturday, November 4, 2017, Brian White <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I actually agree! As long as you're not going to mind.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> bkw
>>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 4, 2017 8:00 AM, "Stephen Adolph" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> It is such a simple board.  I think this would be an excellent
>>>>>> opportunity for someone who wants to learn Eagle!!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Brian White <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Steve,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There IS room to install pin headers the normal way, even ordinary
>>>>>>> cheap ones without needing special low profile ones. Though, low profile
>>>>>>> would allow a little room for the pins to stick out of the top a little
>>>>>>> without having to be shaved exactly flush with the top surface.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, if the components were on the underside, and the through-holes
>>>>>>> were small diameter to fit round pins the normal way, and the solder 
>>>>>>> sode
>>>>>>> of the pins were sized to match the pcb, or nipped flush after the fact,
>>>>>>> then it just fits, even with common cheap pin headers with 4.2mm 
>>>>>>> combined
>>>>>>> insulator + shoulder.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The contact pin needs to be trimmed down to 3.6mm and the solder pin
>>>>>>> needs to be trimmed down to 1.6mm (pcb thickness)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And really, we can probably find pins ready made already close to
>>>>>>> those dimensions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But even with the common pins, it would be a lot easier to build
>>>>>>> than extracting them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://photos.app.goo.gl/JJuaZyszT0z5ZQiO2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm looking for possible parts that won't even need trimming now.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> bkw
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>

Reply via email to