they are 29$ new on newegg

On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 4:49 AM, Anthony Coghlan <coghl...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks, Peter. I think I’m going to try the barcode reader you use if I
> can get it on eBay cheaply, as it may be more reliable anyway.  Perhaps I
> have to try loading the driver and program with REX temporarily disabled as
> an experiment.  I suspect a conflict in memory and don’t otherwise know how
> to resolve that.
>
> Best wishes,
> Anthony
>
>
>
> On Friday, March 2, 2018, Peter Noeth <petern0...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I don't have a REX in my M102, but I have been using the BCR to do
>> "pantry" and "wine cellar" inventory. Both are in the basement, so are not
>> readily accessible when one wants to know what is down there. I am not
>> using the Radio Shack wand, but instead am using a UniTech
>> MS120-NTCB00-SG "industrial strength" wand. It is "plug-in" compatible with
>> the RS wand, and has a sapphire tip that doesn't abrade the barcode labels
>> and keeps dust out of the wand. It also has better "dynamic range" so has
>> no problems reading low contrast barcodes or ines in color. I am using the
>> sample "Simple Inventory" program (with some modifications) that came with
>> the RS Barcode Reader package. I read the "database" file into Excel
>> and keep a printout in the kitchen. The program works well, and barcode
>> reads are quite reliable once you get used to the swiping speed needed.
>>
>> As to your program conflicts, problem with many of the early computers
>> with "operating systems" supplied by Microsoft, is the RAM driver concept
>> is limited in practical use. Microsoft intended the RAM driver facility to
>> patch a ROM driver that may have bugs or add additional planned system
>> expansion (like the DVI, Bar Code Reader, TDD, Option ROM, etc.). Later
>> third party developers who had a product that used their own RAM driver all
>> seemed to locate them in the same address in memory (top of available RAM,
>> the logical place to put it). This creates memory conflicts. Especially in
>> computers using the Intel 8080/8085 processors that do not support
>> "relative" addressing. Without relative addressing, the user cannot move a
>> driver to a different starting address in memory without recompiling it
>> first, and since the user does not get a copy of the source code, he is
>> usually out of luck.
>>
>> There were a few attempts using programs that would read the code of the
>> driver and attempt to find all of the JMP and CALL instructions and patch
>> them directly to a new base starting address, but it was not always
>> successful, as often times the driver would contain inline data bytes that
>> would confuse the conversion program. These programs usually worked on
>> computers using the Z80 processors, since it did support relative
>> addressing.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> ------------------------
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> Message: 14
>> Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 00:57:07 -0500
>> From: Anthony Coghlan <coghl...@gmail.com>
>> To: "m...@bitchin100.com" <m...@bitchin100.com>
>> Subject: Re: [M100] Bar code reader with REX
>> Message-ID:
>>         <canesrqv93k+ksufjam+a-lgikozpwwdubcgget4u-uk2ogz...@mail.gm
>> ail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> Yes, that was the drive belt I used also if I recall, made by Russell
>> Industries.  I can?t find my old purchase info from eBay, but it was about
>> $9 at the time.  (I think Brian mentioned that price as well.)  It was so
>> nice to see the drive come to life!
>>
>> Best wishes,
>> Anthony
>>
>>
>> All on the list:  any tips on reliably using the bar code reader?  Thanks.
>> I?m threatening to inventory our pantry if I can get it working, though my
>> wife doesn?t think that?s such a practical application...  :)
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>
>>

Reply via email to