seems that low codes survive being loaded into basic. they don't survive being translated from a .DO.
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 2:35 PM, Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> wrote: > good question. what I do now is transfer the DO file, and read into a .BA > in the M100. > A separate thing would be to transfer a .BA, and just look at the memory > contents before it is loaded/run, and after. > > I don't know what will happen > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 2:30 PM, John R. Hogerhuis <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 11:24 AM, Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> basic programs can't have binary codes <32decimal. I think most or all >>> of those codes have special meanings. >>> all of these options would be nice to capture in a document. >>> >> >> >> What I was wondering is, is that an issue of untokenized BASIC, or is it >> also a limitation of a tokenized BASIC program. >> >> So if you have bytes < 32 in a static string or DATA statement in a >> tokenized BASIC program, will it still load without corrupting the memory >> files area in general, and be runnable? >> >> -- John. >> > >
