On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 9:10 AM Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> wrote:
> Not yet. I'm going to be testing in a bit and I will let you know. I > always use laddie for my development, but it would be good to know if other > solutions like Nadsbox have any issue too. > > actually - another question. > Any issue running at faster than 19200? I think your program hterm had > the pokes needed to run flat out, right? > > I wonder if I will be unable to keep up, and will overflow the circular > buffer. reading 128 bytes at 76800 ... might be hard to get enough bytes > out of the buffer in time. > > 38400 and 76800 work on m10x but I don’t remember using those higher bps rates with laddie. Also it always involved hardware flow control to keep from overrunning the 64 byte receive queue. I’m sure it can be made to work. Note that the t200 didnt seem to support 76800 and I don’t remember if it supported 38400. Not sure why it didn’t work. The code is pretty much the same. — John.
