Oops, that should have been *LCD*.
Ken
On 11/14/18 12:50 PM, Ken Pettit wrote:
I don't mean to speak for Steve, but I have seen the code. It isn't
really a space issue but more of a control issue. Increasing beyond 16
entries means additional space on the LDC to represent them,
additional code in the control path to manage > 16 entries, additional
bits in the image "dictionary" stored in the FLASH, etc. It would be
an architecture change.
Ken
On 11/14/18 12:33 PM, bogus maximus wrote:
Perhaps more space can be accomplished with some sort of compression
of backup data?
Bogdan
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 11:05 AM Stephen Adolph <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Kurt, 16 is the max envisioned. To change that would be a some
effort. Let me think about a solution.
..steve
On Wednesday, November 14, 2018, Kurt McCullum
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
That's great news Steve! Quick question. Is rex limited to 16
RAM images or can more of the 768k be used?
Kurt
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018, at 6:05 PM, Stephen Adolph wrote:
All,
I have an updated software load for REX which I will be
posting shortly.
Now that it is working well again, I feel ok selling REXNEC.
I have 3 units available. Contact me if you have interest
in one.
thanks,
Steve
