If that's for me,  yes.

 ...


On 12/17/18, Peter Vollan <dprogra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Do you know that we are not talking about the system ROM, but, rather,
> an option ROM?
>
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2018 at 10:46, John Gardner <gof...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Will do.  Memory claims there were two ROMs - One
>>
>> marked "TS-DOS",  & an unmarked chip  I assumed
>>
>> was the OEM 8201a ROM.
>>
>> Its possible that's what it really was,  I suppose...
>>
>>  ...
>>
>>
>> On 12/17/18, Kurt McCullum <ku...@fastmail.com> wrote:
>> > John,
>> >
>> > If you get a chance to check, and it does contain the ROM, please let
>> > me
>> > know. That is one ROM that has fallen through the cracks over time.
>> > Kurt
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018, at 10:25 AM, John Gardner wrote:
>> >> I still have the machine - Not sure about the ROM / manual.
>> >>
>> >> ...
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 12/17/18, Kurt McCullum <ku...@fastmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> An NEC version or a Tandy version? The Tandy 100/102 ROM is on the
>> >>> Club100 site and on the REX download ZIPs. If you have the NEC
>> >>> versions,>> I'd love to get a download of the ROM image.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018, at 10:19 AM, Wayne Talbot wrote:
>> >>>> I have a machine and a Multiple rom. I used it quite a bit doing
>> >>>> financials.>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018, 11:53 AM Kurt McCullum
>> >>>> <ku...@fastmail.com wrote:>> __
>> >>>>> Thanks Jack,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> That's the first confirmation that I have received that the ROM
>> >>>>> actually exits. I take it you not longer have the machine or
>> >>>>> ROM?>>>>>>
>> >>>>> Kurt
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018, at 9:50 AM, John Gardner wrote:
>> >>>>>> Kurt,  it's a long time ago now (1994?) but an 8201a
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I purchased at a surplus store came with a Multiplan
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> manual in a Ring Binder.  I'm pretty sure there was a
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> ROM too,  but so far don't remember what became of it.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> HTH...
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Jack
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> ...
>> >>>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >
>> >
>

Reply via email to