Yes, I think so.
But that also means I had the concept wrong. I thought that the RAM-switching
was done ON the REX, and that the live RAM was on the REX. If I understand it
now - sorry I'm slow - the RAM-image is copied into the live RAM of the machine.
But, that also mean that, in order to be able to take full advantage of REX,
you do need a 32KB machine, or upgrade to it.
Sad if you happen to find an 8KB Model 100, or a 24 KB Model 102... :-/
Greetings from the TyRannoSaurus
Jan-80
From: Stephen Adolph <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, 25 January 2019, 20:20
Subject: Re: [M100] REX in a sub-standard machine
Ram images are sized to match what is in the M100. example you cite would be
24kB of usable image data within a 32 Kb "record" on the flash...does that
answer the question ? ;)
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 2:17 PM Fred Whitaker <[email protected]> wrote:
If it is a Model 100, and you have a quad, you can enjoy 32K on four screens.
Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: M100 <[email protected]> on
behalf of Jan Vanden Bossche <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2019 10:51:18 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [M100] REX in a sub-standard machine If you plug in a REX in a machine
that has only 24 KB of RAM, do you still enjoy RAM-images of 32 KB ?
How does the standard 24 KB influece - or not - the operation of the REX ?
Greetings from the TyRannoSaurus
Jan-80
