On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 10:53 PM Brian White <[email protected]> wrote:

> Did you not understand the part where I explained the intent of the post
> explicitly, JUST exactly to head of exactly this completely predictable and
> obvious sort of willful misinterpretation?
>
> And I did not swear.
>
>
The way you head off annoying people is to not shoot off your mouth in the
first place. You can save yourself publishing the bad opinion, and save
yourself the need for the caveat.

There is zero value to transferring in a EOF character that corrupts the
RAM filesystem.

Zero. And when I add the enhancement to LaddieAlpha, there won't be any
warning or banner to advertise the fact that the RAM filesystem won't get
corrupted. Or that it could have corrupted but didn't. And there won't be a
command line switch to force the corruption just in case they really,
really wanted it.

-- John.

Reply via email to