I bought one of those because I thought it was a curious artifact, which
was an x86 machine that did not run DOS.

It was a pain to get working, and I can imagine that the battery made it an
impossible sell when for a few hundred dollars more you could buy a DOS
laptop that was much more functional.

An intellectual curiosity but a dead end.  I sold mine to John Hogerhuis.



On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 11:00 AM Fugu ME100 <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have one at the moment. I would have to agree wth the comments it is big
> and heavy – it has a huge NiCad built in. The 600 is a curious machine, a
> 'missing link' from the Model T to the MS-DOS machines.  I do not use it
> all, it needs to sit on a desk it is so heavy unlike my favorite 102 which
> can be used anywhere.
>
> When the seller shipped mine they did not pack it too well and with the
> heavy internal battery the upper case was pretty much smashed to pieces
> when the NiCad battery broke free in transit.  The plastic is brittle and
> it does break very easily.  So make sure the seller packs it really well if
> you decide to go ahead.   Getting it working was quite a challenge as it
> needed the case rebuilding and parts replaced due to age and the shipping
> disaster.
>
> The Model 600 WiKi is a good resource to start to repairs.
>
> From: M100 <[email protected]> on behalf of Stephen
> Adolph <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: <[email protected]>
> Date: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 at 6:23 AM
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [M100] ebay seller
>
> I had 2 at one point. I liked the challenge of getting it working but in
> the end I didn't have a use relative to the M100.  I felt similarly about
> the DVI.  Had 2 but got passed them along eventually.
> A bit too big, bulky, heavy etc.
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 9:19 AM Tom Dison <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> There is a model 600 for sale at a good price on eBay, but I'm kind of
>> hesitant. It seems to be quite the oddball model in the series. Does anyone
>> have experience with it?
>>
>> <snip.
>>
>
>

Reply via email to