It's not a complaint, it's a discussion. I don't even use Laddie so far. I've only been using dlplus because I just prefer plain c as a requirement vs mono/.net. Simple preferrence for me. If I wasn't so averse to .net, I'm sure I would be able to modify Laddie from source to suit my personal prefferences if that's all I cared about.
Well it's a complaint only in the sense that I wish someone in the world was not doing this thing I think is misguided, and misguiding others, and perhaps even creating a standard which is not a good standard. Not a complaint in the sense that I use a thing and wish it worked differently for me. I agree completely in characterizing it as theory. I just don't think theory is so distant from practical. Theory is just what comes first, getting the theory right, so you then know what to do for real. Without hashing out the theory, you may or may not then get the "practical" wrong. -- bkw On Sat, May 4, 2019, 8:05 PM John R. Hogerhuis <[email protected]> wrote: > For myself and my friends including you. Yours is the only complaint so > far, and it's on theory not practical issues. > > I think I'm doing OK. > > -- John > > On Sat, May 4, 2019, 4:44 PM Brian White <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If course it's your program. But why did you write it? Only for yourself? >> Or in the hopes that it would be useful to others? >> >> It came from you, but now, it's a thing which exists in everyone's world, >> not just yours, and that is why I have a right to discuss it's function, >> which is all this is. >> >> On Sat, May 4, 2019, 11:53 AM John R. Hogerhuis <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> We're not relitigating this, counselor. >>> >>> It's my program. I do what I think is best. What I did is what I think >>> is best. >>> >>> The only change I'd make is to make Tsdos not care about DO vs D? >>> Extensions in the DOS same as the interactive mode. >>> >>> >>> -- John. >>> >>>
