not sure if i have bad 4116's still will look

On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 5:14 PM Jeffrey Birt <bir...@soigeneris.com> wrote:

> It depends on if my insurance company quits fighting paying for the
> procedure or not. I'm planning on not being able to make it still. I would
> be happy to pay for postage.
>
> Jeff
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: M100 <m100-boun...@lists.bitchin100.com> On Behalf Of Josh Malone
> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2019 7:00 PM
> To: m...@bitchin100.com
> Subject: Re: [M100] In search of bad DRA< - 4164, 41256, etc.
>
> I've got several bad 4164s -- Microns pulled from an Apple 2 repair.
> Are you still unable to make it to TASM? I can post a couple to you if so.
>
> -Josh
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 7:54 PM Jeffrey Birt <bir...@soigeneris.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I built a DRAM tester for fun and to brush up on Arduino development. I
> have a lot of students I work with use Arduino, so I wanted to build
> something to stay up to date and I have not done anything with an Arduino
> for more than a year. I found a project online as a starting point and
> added an automatic DRAM refresh driven by Timer2 overflow. Even with a
> pokey Arduino and the ISR in C it can refresh 64 rows in less and 100us.
> >
> > I did a quick test with a 41256 just now and was happy I could
> read/write all bits successfully. Then I realized I don’t have any known
> bad 4164/41256 type DRAM chips on hand. So, if you happen to have a few bad
> DRAM chips on hand and you’re in the USA I would gladly take them off your
> hands. Otherwise I’ll have to figure out a way to inject a simulated fault.
> Maybe writing a wrong value to a known cell after writing the proper
> pattern to all cells would be a good enough simulation?
> >
> > I still have a way to go with the software. The original project I found
> online used separate functions for each test pattern. I want to create a
> single function that will write a bit pattern that is passed to it and then
> verify that pattern is in memory. Maybe a n second pause would be good to
> have in place between the write and verify to ensure that the refresh is
> working properly?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jeff Birt
> >
> >
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to