That is what I am doing, cleaning it up for the model T. The code that I posted makes no sense. The ON....GOTO statement only has one entry, and it goes to.... the next line, where the program would have gone anyway. You can just eliminate that line and it does the exact same thing.
On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 at 07:55, Dan Higdon <[email protected]> wrote: > > Jason, I'm glad you left it alone. I think there's historical value in the > original text. > Having said that, if someone (maybe me?) rewrites it to be more ModelT > friendly, that would be fine, too. > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 8:39 AM Jason Benson <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> > That's the worst way possible to do "press any key to continue". >> > In my own "walk through", I'm replacing those with >> >> When I was briefly debugging it I came across a number of things I would >> change if I had written it, and I considered just rewriting chunks of it, >> but I decided to leave it more or less intact as a historical example. If I >> actually needed to use this for a D&D 1st Ed campaign I would definitely >> rewrite it though. >> >> On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 6:35 PM Dan Higdon <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> That's the worst way possible to do "press any key to continue". >>> In my own "walk through", I'm replacing those with >>> >>> 1300 if inkey$="" then 1300 >>> 1320 cls >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 5:16 PM Peter Vollan <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> BTW, what the hell is this: >>>> >>>> 1300 INPUT C >>>> 1310 ON C GOTO 1320 >>>> 1320 PRINT CHR$(12) >>>> >>>> On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 14:09, Jason Benson <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Good to know. Here's the same file renamed to DMPS.DO >>>> > As for the error you ran into, I'm not at all surprised, there are >>>> > probably a few of bugs in there I missed and didn't trigger when I did >>>> > some brief testing on it. >>>> > >>>> > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 5:03 PM John R. Hogerhuis <[email protected]> >>>> > wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 1:58 PM Jason Benson <[email protected]> >>>> >> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>> I was loading the file through Virtual T. and running it just fine. Is >>>> >>> it VT automatically converting it to a tokenized basic file? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >> Yes.
