Sounds like a plan, I’m currently doing a first pass getting the routine headercomments in and translating the none sense opcodes into db and dw’s from the m100 dis. I’ll set up a github repo once I’m through this first pass. Next pass will be find and replace on all standard addresses and known rom functions. That way the m100 and t102 should be mostly identical which should help adding the other comments that are available.
Cheers, Erik > On 17 Jun 2020, at 18:06, Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, it would be great to make this collaborative. I have a lot of my own > notes on a disassembly, and I also have a paper disassembly that I acquired a > while back. > > >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:35 AM Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I’m currently well on my way to merge the annotated M100 rom with a >> disassemble of the T102 rom. This will include documentation of the >> differences. I hope to create a working .asm file with labels and such that >> can be reassembled into a functioning Rom (I’m working my way towards a >> custom os-rom for my 102). >> >> If anyone is interested I can put it up on my GitHub account so you can get >> it. I can imagine this could be interesting for the VirtualT emulator as it >> provides all the annotations on disassembling the M100 rom but not the T102 >> currently (except for the RST opcodes). >> >> Cheers, >> Erik
