Two cut off pencils with erasers, wrapped with a bit of tape, give you
rubber feet ! ;-)

m

On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 7:52 PM Robert J. Hutchins <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I just love a cheap lo-tech solution!
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* M100 [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Alex
> ...
> *Sent:* Friday, July 09, 2021 4:42 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [M100] A decent replacement for M100 "Feet"
>
>
>
> Fancy!
>
>
> I just cut a BIC pen tube in half and stuck them in the screw holes. Works
> great.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 4:01 PM Brian Brindle <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I found this thing called a "Laptop Foot" at the checkout of my local
> Barnes and Noble the other day. I am slightly embarrassed to admit that I
> paid $12 for it but also I've been very happy with how it works so...
>
>
>
> It's just the one wedge, you pop it under the back of the M100 and it just
> sort of tripods. It's very stable, no rocking or anything and has it at a
> decent angle for me. I find it easier to keep up with and quicker to deploy
> than my plastic feet.
>
>
>
> Quick Amazon search for "Laptop Foot" or Universal Laptop/Notebook stands
> will reveal 4-packs available from $10-$13 but totally lacks the instant
> gratification I received for 4x the price, not to mention the blank look
> from my SO as I ran from the checkout to the Starbucks inside, ripped my
> rubberized wedge from its box and plopped my M102 on it happily
> exclaiming "Hu?! HU?!! Awesome right?!"
>
>
>
> She didn't respond, likely because it was too awesome for her to handle.
> Anyway, I thought you guys would appreciate it.
>
>
>
> Behold - the M100 foot!
>
>
>
> http://niedobry.com/mod100/images/
>
>
>
>
>
> Brian
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Disclaimer: Any resemblance between the above views and those of my
> employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely coincidental.
> Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic.
> The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold
> them is left as an exercise for the reader.
> The question of the existence of the reader is left as an exercise for the
> second god coefficient.  (A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral
> polytheism is beyond the scope of this article.) Thanks /usr/games/fortune
>

Reply via email to