I just can't get over some of that stuff from Bing about "we like quality
sites..."

who the what the ever loving F , where do you even begin with that

bkw

On Sat, Nov 12, 2022, 3:20 AM Brian White <[email protected]> wrote:

> wow, that article and the others linked from there are quite enlightening.
>
> I hate to help create a monoculture and single supplier and overlord, but
> it looks like Bing and all of it's resellers should just not be used.
>
> That really sucks because I really hate how much power g already has.
>
> You'd think Bing or any search engine should want to accept reports from
> any random user not just site owners, and it shouldn't matter if a site
> owner is willing to satisfy them. It is valuable to some site owners to be
> listed, so for some there may be that power dynamic where the engine may
> dictate to sites and sites will perform.
>
> But what about the users? The engine purports to be providing a service of
> search results to me a searching user. So in the apparently polyanna
> fantasy world I should be able to say to Bing "hey, bug report, here is
> some stuff on the net that you're failing to show" and they should consider
> that a problem just based on that logic, regardless whether the site owner
> cares to have any special relationship with Bing.
>
> It's almost like Bing doesn't show you what exists, it just shows you the
> sites that pay to be seen. Not literally in money but in cooperation in
> whatever kind of user manipulation game they are playing.
>
> I know google exerts the same sort of editorial control themselves though,
> so, it's not like they're really any better in principle.
>
> --
> bkw
>
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2022, 1:16 AM John R. Hogerhuis <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 7:21 PM Brian K. White <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/11/22 18:59, B 9 wrote:
>>> > On a tangent: I need to work on my searching skills. It occurred to me
>>> a
>>> > while ago that the Tandy 200 schematic looked like the RTS/CTS lines
>>> > were fully wired, but when I searched for things like "model 100
>>> serial
>>> > port rts cts", I never saw that page... Oh! Wait. The problem may have
>>> > been that I was googling with DuckDuckGo. I'm able to get
>>> bitchin100.com
>>> > <http://bitchin100.com> as the first result when I search for "model
>>> 100
>>> > uart", but only on Google.
>>>
>>>
>>> I have noticed this for probably 2 or more years now. I've been meaning
>>> to say something but never did. It's like bitchin100 is blacklisted on
>>> DDG, (and thus, probably on Bing too). Not only do none of the wiki
>>> pages show up, even if you search for literally "bitchin100.com", you
>>> can scroll for pages and pages of results forever and never get a single
>>> link to any bitchin100.com url, only references to it in other pages,
>>> mostly archived mail list posts on Narkive.
>>>
>>>
>> I don't know. I only ever search on Google. The progression for me was
>> Gopher, then Altavista, Yahoo, and now Google. Each better than the last,
>> haven't felt any compelling need to switch again. Privacy? That ship has
>> sailed, went into orbit, crashed into the an asteroid, merged with
>> alien spores and is sentient.
>>
>> And DDG/Bing already don't like me, so...
>>
>> Maybe Dreamhost IPs are the issue?
>>
>> As to spammers, some spam was loaded onto the wiki at some point, but it
>> wasn't there very long and I cleaned it up. I think it probably predates
>> DDG and Bing, and Google has never cared. But that spam attack is why I
>> make accounts upon request from members.
>>
>> URL rewriting... I could do that. But I don't see how it would help.  I
>> cannot think of a URL scheme that you could easily infer article titles.
>>
>> Most of Bitchin100 is the wiki. To link, I type bitchin100.com/wiki into
>> my url bar, then search in the mediawiki search, find the result, and then
>> copy and paste the URL.
>>
>> "tandy.wiki/REX"
>>
>> Most of the articles on bitchin100 have longer titles.
>>
>> B100 links are like
>>
>> bitchin100.com/wiki/index.php?title=Model_100_Serial_Interface
>>
>> rewriting I guess could skip the "wiki/index.php?title=" boilerplate.
>>
>> But you'd still need memorize the exact article title... 9/10 I'd end up
>> having to search anyway... so I don't see the difference.
>>
>>
>> Here's an interesting article on Bing/DDG
>>
>>
>> https://www.jessesquires.com/blog/2022/03/25/my-website-disappeared-from-bing-and-duckduckgo/
>>
>> Sounds like Bing is the way to get your site into DDG.
>>
>> -- John.
>>
>

Reply via email to