I don't know whether to thank you more for fixing the error or for providing the unheard of fantasy of actually getting an answer about something involving a huge faceless uncaring machine!
My mental model of this was like, bitchin100 is like a little sandcastle someone built next to the ocean, and the ocean flattened it. There's nothing you can do about that except build your sandcastle somewhere else or not out of sand. What is unimaginable is complaining to the ocean and the ocean responds! bkw On Mon, Nov 14, 2022, 7:00 AM Ken St. Cyr <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi folks – > > > > Long time reader, first time poster 😊 > > > > I work at Microsoft, so I reached out to the Bing team internally to see > if they could help. It looks like some of the wiki pages were triggering a > block on our end. I don’t know the specifics, but one of the engineers > removed the block this morning and he told me that it will be a few days > before it takes effect. Bing is a large product, so I’m sure whatever they > did needs time to propagate. Give it until the end of this week, and if > search results still aren’t coming back, then I’ll circle back around with > the Bing team again. > > > > I appreciate you all – the conversations and information shared here > within this community are absolutely amazing! > > > > //Ken S. > > > > *From:* M100 <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *John R. > Hogerhuis > *Sent:* Sunday, November 13, 2022 3:54 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [M100] Bitchin' 100 on Bing > > > > " So would it be of benefit to contact the owner of 'Bitchin'100' to > update their web indexing per the different search engines such as Bing?" > > I did, it has made no difference yet. > > I submitted a support request through the webmaster tools, I guess we'll > see. > > > > It would be much better if they provided public, searchable reasons for > content removal. They do have some kind of removal records but they make no > effort to help you find your needle in that haystack. > > And given they're a "search engine" I assume this is the way they want it. > > > > -- John. >
