Hi Jesse,

Do you happen to have any more details on your setup?

I suppose in an ideal world, I’d like a setup that I can dial out from my
rotary phone, and a second line that I could dial in to a modem.

How difficult does that sound? I tried to use MagicJack previously but the
compression codex they use doesn’t play well with data transfer.

On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 8:11 AM Jesse Lafleur <[email protected]> wrote:

> I can provide bell 103 compatible 100% online dial-in access to linux
> servers/services using voip/asterisk/etc. I use my m100 to dial into my
> local home pbx server, and ive even tried it over the web!
>
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 7:44 AM [email protected] <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> What are the odds that any of these BBSes would allow dialing in from a
>> real phone line?
>>
>> There is a Commodore 64 BBS out there called BorderlineBBS that has a
>> hybrid Telnet/Dial-Up interface.
>>
>> I managed to use the acoustic couplers to dial in once from the Model T,
>> but ever since switching to VOIP I wasn’t able to get it to work.
>>
>> I really always loved BBSing, so I would be in full support of using a
>> Model T focused BBS.
>>
>> -George
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 7:30 AM Ben Strewens <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2023-02-26 4:50 a.m., Daniel L wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm considering a specialized launch of a BBS catering to the modelT
>>> community. Any good boards out there already doing this that I can peruse?
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>> I'm currently working on one that will support multiple systems,
>>> including the model 100. I'm aiming for going all the way down to the Epson
>>> HX-20, but we'll see how that pans out. It won't be up and running for a
>>> while yet. We're supposed to get a new ISP here this year. The one who
>>> bought out the company I was with closed all my ports and had no clue how
>>> to re-open them, so my BBS got shut down. In the meantime, I figured I'd
>>> work on one that caters to the vintage computer community. I still have
>>> lots of work ahead of me.
>>>
>>

Reply via email to