I probably missed it and can't easily find the previous discussion,
but what diameter wire do you suggest? I see the hole size 0.6mm/24
mil but not the wire gauge.

Thanks!

On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 7:56 PM Brian K. White <b.kenyo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> You have lost me.
>
> If you want to dump or re-write the flexrom, you can just do it it it's
> programming adapter.
>
> I thought you wanted to dump the original rom?
>
> And if you want to avoid all the hardware actions while changing the
> main rom, that's exactly what REX Classic allows. It's purely software
> once you set that up, and even if you botch both primary and secondary
> images, you only need to open the option rom compartment instead of the
> whole machine to revert to the internal eeprom.
>
> If you have a soic-28 test clip, you *might* be able to program the
> eeprom without removing from the machine. Mostly it should be ok, the
> board allows the programmer to drive /WE for instance, it's definitely
> ok to program the chip directly with a test clip if the board is not
> installed in the machine. But but one thing I don't know is, if the
> board is installed in the machine, all the pins are connected to the
> bus. Mostly that should be ok but one thing I don't know is what happens
> when the programmer tries to provide power on the vcc pin? Does it power
> up the whole machine? Even with the memory power switch turned off,
> which normally kills everything, this would be injecting power to the
> rail from a point "inside the walls".
>
> If you're worried about the legs, and you're right that it would be a
> pain to repair a loose one after the frame was cut away, I now actually
> prefer gold plated plain brass wire.
> https://gist.github.com/bkw777/52d85d89eeff8445cc667685d05ea94d
>
> The advantages are,
> - just wire, no special shapes to cut off or anything, no single special
> supplier
> - a few feet makes hundreds of 6mm legs
> - the wire is round, so there is no problem with it rotating when
> loosened and resoldered
> - gold plated
> - repair/replacement of a broken leg is trivial
>
> The disadvantages are,
> - each leg has to be soldered individually, no one-piece connector or
> frame like with a normal pin header
> - no simple supplier to point to, it's such a generic thing that there
> is no part number or such, except in large quantities from bulk
> suppliers. The various suppliers (for small quantities) I've found have
> all been transient like Etsy or Ebay links that don't work a year later.
> And it's easy to end up with gold colored aluminum wire or brass wire
> that isn't gold plated (which starts tarnishing within a year), since no
> one selling the stuff is writing their descriptions for electronics use.
> I have also gotten wire from aliexpress that was thinner than claimed,
> which ends up being too thin and weak despite you buying the correct awg
> or mm number.
>
> But if you do get some, then you have a lifetime supply after that.
>
> The preloaded bom carts with the pcbs have the sil leadframes just
> because it's an actual part that can be ordered normally along with
> everything else, and is both a little cheaper and a little more
> convenient to solder than the MillMax or Keystone micro pins which could
> also be ordered as part of the bom.
>
> --
> bkw
>
> On 11/28/23 13:32, runrin wrote:
> > This is a good idea, but I've already got my new EEPROM in there and
> > every time I remove it and put it back in, I get worried I'll break off
> > one of the legs and have to resolder it.
> >
> > The leadframes used to make DIP pins on Brian's FlexROM adapter board
> > work well, but I really don't want to have to replace them when I
> > inevitably break one off.
> >
> > Would you use a BASIC script to do this Mike? Just a loop to PRINT each
> > byte to the COM port?
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 11:45:10AM -0500, Mike Stein wrote:
> >> Why not just dump it out of the M100 directly?
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 9:50 AM Brian K. White <b.kenyo...@gmail.com> 
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 11/27/23 11:48, runrin wrote:
> >>>> Do you know if it's possible to dump the original ROM using the
> >>>> programming adapter for the FlexROM 100?
> >>>
> >>> Maybe.
> >>>
> >>> There are two things to worry about and I'll just think out loud right 
> >>> here.
> >>>
> >>> 1
> >>> The programming adapter presents a pinout for a 28C256, not a 27C256 or
> >>> mask rom. Those are only a couple wires different, but then again, since
> >>> it's just for reading, and the read cycle is the same, you could just
> >>> tell the programmer that it's reading a 28C256 (force it, override chip
> >>> id detection), and that won't hurt the rom.
> >>>
> >>> 2
> >>> Pin 23. The programming adapter routes pin 27 from the programmer (/WE
> >>> if a 28C256 were in the programmer) to pin 23 of the DIP socket, which
> >>> is ALE on the LH535618 rom, but the flexrom board connects it to the /WE
> >>> pin on the actual 28C256 on the board.
> >>>
> >>> I *think* what you want to do is take a DIP-28 socket and bend out pin
> >>> 23, connect the bent-out pin 23 to pin 27, put the modified socket into
> >>> the programming adapter and then the old rom into the modified socket.
> >>> Then tell the programmer to read a 28C256 and ignore chip id. The socket
> >>> is just to avoid bending the leg on the old chip.
> >>>
> >>> IE, feed /CE from the programmer to both /CE and ALE on the chip, and
> >>> don't connect anything to /WE at the programmer.
> >>>
> >>> But, at that point it's almost simpler to just make the entire adapter
> >>> manually with two dip sockets and wires. Especially since it's a
> >>> one-off. In that case, use a 27C256 pinout and tell the programmer to
> >>> read a 27C256 instead of 28C256.
> >>>
> >>> But if your chip has any of these part numbers, then it's already been
> >>> dumped.
> >>> https://bitchin100.com/wiki/index.php?title=Model_and_ROM_information
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> bkw
> >>>
>
> --
> bkw
>

Reply via email to