> I was using Tomcat 7 that comes bundled with WTP. > AFAICT It does incremental publishes, but I have no idea if it uses Ant under > the hood.
I haven't looked at latest Tomcat 7 adapter - will do, but I can't be doing incremental if it was taking this long ;) I'll try have a look - I'm curious. > My application does not use EJB, JMS etc, only Servet API, that standalone > Tomcat can handle just fine. > JBoss contains a servlet container and also 1001 things don't need so I > really don't see how could it be faster ;) <shameless plug>Have you tried AS7 yet ? :)</plug> /max > > Cheers, > Rafał > > On 08/05/2011 05:25 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >> On Aug 5, 2011, at 14:19, Rafał Krzewski wrote: >> >>> Definetely, you don't need to do a Maven build to have the changes >>> reflected in /WEB-INF when using Webby or M2E-WTP. That happens >>> automagically. >>> From my experience Webby is 5 to 10x faster than M2E-WTP for a project with >>> a dozen modules, several thousand classes and ~0.5 million lines of code. >>> When I paired up Webby with JRebel, I'm getting turnaround times< 2s >>> between Java code change and seeing result in the browser, on my 3 year old >>> 2GHz Centrino laptop. >> Which WTP server adapter were you using ? That is the "slow part" to care >> about. Just saying WTP doesn't mean slow ;) >> >> If it was one of the classic WTP one's that uses Ant for their packaging or >> only do full publishes then that explains it. >> If it was one of ours (JBoss Tools AS server adapter) I'm interested in >> finding the hold up. >> >> /max > > _______________________________________________ > m2e-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-users /max http://about.me/maxandersen _______________________________________________ m2e-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-users
