On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 02:31:04PM -0400, David M. Warme wrote:
> Eric,
>
> I have incorporated most of the changes that you have identified. This
> patch is from very recent branch-1.4.
Thanks for re-working this!
I'm still reluctant to merge this into branch-1.4 (which is supposed
to be for bug-fixes only), but my plan is to take your version for
branch-1.6 and apply it this weekend if I can.
At that point, I probably need to cut an alpha release (I think the
next version number is v1.5.89) so all the current code in branch-1.6
will be more formal than just a git release, even though there's still
lots to do before I feel comfortable releasing 1.6 proper (among
others, I still need to resolve the emacs/BRE/ERE regex flavor issue
in a way that can be probed at runtime without spurious warnings).
> 7cbad39e..99952f14 100644 --- a/doc/m4.texi +++ b/doc/m4.texi @@ -36,6
> +36,14 @@ @r{[}@var{\varname\} = @samp{\default\}@r{]} @end macro +@c
> @auxresult{auxfile} +@c ------------ +@c Used in examples to indicate output
For whatever reason, your message was sent in mime/multipart with both
text and html versions. I read my email in text (on purpose), and
that renders your patch extremely broken. Having to scrape your patch
out of html is hard, but probably doable, so I'll attempt it this time.
But in the future, please send patches as plain-text only (possibly as
attachments, if you can't figure out how to make your mailer do it
nicely in the body), so that they don't get corrupted like this.
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.
Virtualization: qemu.org | libguestfs.org
_______________________________________________
M4-patches mailing list
M4-patches@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/m4-patches
