You could add a constant vector without too much trouble. If you end
up doing it, please send us a diff and we'll include it in the next
release.
Thanks,
Ali
On Mar 6, 2007, at 5:21 PM, Vilas Sridharan wrote:
Hi Ali,
Thank you for pointing that out -- I hadn't seen that originally.
Of course, one of the things that I glossed over in my initial mail
was that I actually was hoping to be able to create a constant
Stats::Vector in the constructor. The Stats::constant seems to
understandably only support single values. (I am essentially
trying to compute a weighted sum using a Stats::Formula as the
product of two Stats::Vectors.)
I have come up with a workaround for my own purposes, but it's ugly
(set the Stats::Vector values the first time the object is
called). I was hoping for a slightly more elegant way of doing it,
but oh well :-).
Thanks,
-Vilas
On 3/6/07, Ali Saidi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Vilias,
Take a look at the the end of NSGigE::regStats(). I think you just
need to wrap your constant in Stats::constant(myconstant) like is
done with the txBandwidth formula.
Ali
On Mar 6, 2007, at 4:14 PM, Vilas Sridharan wrote:
> Hello again --
>
> Using M5 2.0b2, I have created a class which I instantiate in
> various CPU structures. This class uses Stats::Formula objects to
> calculate values for me at the end of simulation. These values
> involve per-structure parameters which are constant over simulation
> but different between each structure. I'm having trouble getting
> these values into my Stats::Formula variables. I may just be
> overlooking something silly here...
>
> From what I can tell, it seems that all the Stats get re-
> initialized sometime between the constructor call and the time
> simulation starts. (I've tried variously putting init code in the
> constructor and in regStats(), after the Stats have been
> registered, with the same results.) Is there a way to declare a
> 'constant' stat that doesn't get initialized like this at the
> begining of execution? For some reason, I can't seem to use the
> value that I pass in directly in the Stats::Formula, either (the
> website has a note to this effect.)
>
> Am I missing something?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Vilas
> _______________________________________________
> m5-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
_______________________________________________
m5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
_______________________________________________
m5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
_______________________________________________
m5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
