The last line is very important, and no the binary wasn't executed.
It's not a question of input files or anything else, the problem is
that binary. I would guess that its a OSF/1 binary and not a Linux
binary or it's not a binary at all. Just take some random file of
bits, make it executable and run it. You'll get the same error.
Ali
On Oct 7, 2007, at 6:10 AM, w. tan wrote:
actually the entire command line output went like
# ./twolf00.peak.ev6 test
modprobe: FATAL: Could not load /lib/modules/2.6.13/modules.dep: No
such file or directory
modprobe: FATAL: Could not load /lib/modules/2.6.13/modules.dep: No
such file or directory
bash: ./twolf00.peak.ev6: cannot execute binary file
(sorry for not including the last line in my last email, my bad)
so i think the benchmark was not executed. and besides, no output
file was produced. the name of the executable changed since i
switched to the precompiled binary i downloaded off the Internet(so
the crosscompiler can't be the culprit).
am i missing something? i mean, what i did basically was place the
binary and the input files in the image(latest-linux.img, the one
that came with the m5 distro), boot the simulator, and then run the
executable.
is that the correct procedure for running benchmarks in FS mode?
thanks a lot for taking time to answer my questions.
Ali Saidi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That error shouldn't be a problem. The benchmark is almost
certainly still running, just some syscall it did attempted to load
a module, however that module isn't necessary.
Ali
On Oct 5, 2007, at 9:49 PM, w. tan wrote:
i am trying to run cpu2000 benchmarks in full system mode, and
already compiled the benchmarks using the crosscompiler. after
copying the binaries to the image i then tried running the
benchmarks within the simulated system. i got the error
# ../TimberWolfSC stdcell
modprobe: FATAL: Could not load /lib/modules/2.6.13/modules.dep:
No such file or directory
modprobe: FATAL: Could not load /lib/modules/2.6.13/modules.dep:
No such file or directory
after looking around the net for a while i came upon this message
wherein steve advised another user to have the benchmark(it was
not exactly the same benchmark though) statically linked to get
around this. i then tried statically linking twolf by adding "-
static" to the makefile's "gcc" argument and then crosscompiling
again. the binary's size did increase, but the results are still
the same, it still looks for modules.dep. any ideas? thanks a lot.
Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your
pocket: mail, news, photos & more.
_______________________________________________
m5-users mailing list
m5-users@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
_______________________________________________
m5-users mailing list
m5-users@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your
story.
Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games.
_______________________________________________
m5-users mailing list
m5-users@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
_______________________________________________
m5-users mailing list
m5-users@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
