Take no offense at this question, I ask it of all programmers I work with (they can attest to it):
Are you absolutely sure you're doing what you think you're doing? It's a good rule to go back and verify all of your assumptions about what you've done when things don't make sense. (I kick myself when I don't follow that rule myself.) Said another way, are you sure you recompiled everything correctly and that m5 is using the kernel binary that you think it is? A hidden compiler error message, or an incorrectly set config parameter, or even NFS can thwart these things. config.ini has information about what M5 is using. Are you certain that you're even looking at the correct output file? That said, there should be a .config file that we've provided in the patch set. Is it not there? Nate On Feb 6, 2008 2:56 AM, abc def <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I did configure kernel using menuconfig before running > ,turned framebuffer from Graphics support and then > checked in the .config that "# CONFIG_FB is not set" + > no mention of FRAMEBUFFER. > > However after compiling when i try to use the vmlinux > the same error is coming. > > > > > --- Ali Saidi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > > > You should figure out what the hunk failed and fix > > it, but the problem > > is in the config file. M5 doesn't supporrt frame > > buffers so you need > > to turn off the frame buffer in your kernel config > > file. > > > > Ali > > > > On Feb 5, 2008, at 12:05 PM, abc def wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I applied the patch using patch command on > > > linux-2.6.18 source tree and patch seems to be > > working > > > fine, though for patch_to_2.6.18.8.diff it gave > > one > > > failure for one hunk. > > > > > > Then i compiled the kernel using cross compiler. > > > > > > But when i try to boot with new vmlinux i got this > > > panic and m5 aborted. > > > > > > panic: Device FrameBuffer not imlpmented > > > @ cycle 21786981600 > > > [read:build/ALPHA_FS/dev/baddev.cc, line 58] > > > Program aborted at cycle 21786981600 > > > > > > At that time in console: > > > Entering slaveloop for cpu 3 > > my_rpb=FFFFFC0000018900 > > > Entering slaveloop for cpu 2 > > my_rpb=FFFFFC0000018680 > > > > > > Now is it happening because i didnt apply patch > > using > > > MQ and something got missing?. If that is the case > > > then i will try to figure out about mercurial > > > repository details. > > > > > > Any help will be highly appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- Ali Saidi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > > > > > >> I just added them to the download page > > >> (linux_patches.tar.bz2). > > >> > > >> Ali > > >> > > >> On Jan 30, 2008, at 1:29 PM, nathan binkert > > wrote: > > >> > > >>> I'm certain that this isn't an M5 problem since > > >> I've been using that > > >>> call a lot. 2.6.13 is probably a bit outdated. > > >> I've been using > > >>> 2.6.18 lately and it works there. The port to > > >> more recent versions is > > >>> pretty easy. Ali, aren't the patches available > > >> somewhere? If not, we > > >>> can put them all up on the website. > > >>> > > >>> On Jan 30, 2008 9:21 AM, abc def > > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>>> Hi, > > >>>> > > >>>> I am running a multithreaded application with > > >> regular > > >>>> linux pthreads. > > >>>> > > >>>> I want to bind a single thread to a single > > >> simulated > > >>>> processor. For this purpose i am using > > >>>> sched_setaffinity system call in side the > > common > > >>>> function executed by all threads. > > >>>> > > >>>> But while executing the program the > > >> sched_setaffinity > > >>>> is failing and i get "Function Not implemented" > > >>>> message. > > >>>> > > >>>> I am using m5 beta 4 and default version for > > >> kernel > > >>>> (2.6.13). > > >>>> If the kernel version is not proper for this > > >> feature > > >>>> then is there any other recent version > > available > > >> which > > >>>> has support for processor affinity system call > > >> for > > >>>> alpha? > > >>>> > > >>>> Any help will be highly appreciated. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> ______________________________________________ > > >>>> ¿Con Mascota por primera vez? Sé un mejor > > Amigo. > > >> Entra en Yahoo! > > >>>> Respuestas > > >> http://es.answers.yahoo.com/info/welcome > > >>>> _______________________________________________ > > >>>> m5-users mailing list > > >>>> m5-users@m5sim.org > > >>>> > > >> > > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > >>> m5-users mailing list > > >>> m5-users@m5sim.org > > >>> > > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users > > >>> > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> m5-users mailing list > > >> m5-users@m5sim.org > > >> > > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________ > > > ¿Con Mascota por primera vez? Sé un mejor Amigo. > > Entra en Yahoo! > > > Respuestas > > http://es.answers.yahoo.com/info/welcome > > > _______________________________________________ > > > m5-users mailing list > > > m5-users@m5sim.org > > > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > m5-users mailing list > > m5-users@m5sim.org > > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users > > > > > > > ______________________________________________ > > ¿Con Mascota por primera vez? Sé un mejor Amigo. Entra en Yahoo! Respuestas > http://es.answers.yahoo.com/info/welcome > _______________________________________________ > m5-users mailing list > m5-users@m5sim.org > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users > > _______________________________________________ m5-users mailing list m5-users@m5sim.org http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
