The kernel i am using is actually patched. All patched worked correctly without
giving any error on 2.6.18.8 source tree. But still bootup is very very slow.
Actually, if you already have a more recent version of kernel working perfectly
with beta 4 version why not have that one in standard download?
For people who are doing any thing with multiple cores, pinning thread to a
processor is a very useful feature to have.
----- Mensaje original ----
De: nathan binkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: M5 users mailing list <m5-users@m5sim.org>
Enviado: miércoles, 6 de febrero, 2008 19:48:12
Asunto: Re: [m5-users] sched_setaffinity syscall
>
One
final
confirmation
for
2.6.18.8:
What
was
the
problem?
>
It
seems
to
be
booting
extremely
slow
even
with
atomic
>
cpu
model.
It
got
stuck
at
"[4194001.857552]
SMP:
>
Total
of
8
processors
activated
(31985.87
BogoMIPS)."
>
for
long
time.
>
Earlier
2.6.13
was
booting
very
fast
though
in
same
>
machine
with
same
workload.
>
Do
you
also
see
this
slow
boot-up?
Let
me
check
to
see
if
there
is
a
missing
patch
to
2.6.18.
There
are
certain
functions
(mostly
delay
functions
and
the
idle
loop)
in
the
linux
kernel
that
are
very
slow
if
not
patched.
>
Just
for
curiosity,
what
does
[4194001.857552]
stand
>
for?
This
is
a
linux
thing.
It's
a
timestamp.
Nate
_______________________________________________
m5-users
mailing
list
m5-users@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
______________________________________________
¿Con Mascota por primera vez? Sé un mejor Amigo. Entra en Yahoo! Respuestas
http://es.answers.yahoo.com/info/welcome_______________________________________________
m5-users mailing list
m5-users@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
