On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Huw Wilkins <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu 03 May 2012 16:42:45 EST, Robert Collins wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Julian Edwards >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hi folks >>> >>> Does anyone have any opinions on which browsers we want to have core >>> support >>> for in MAAS? >>> >>> There are a few JS bugs floating around at the moment which manifest >>> differently in different browsers. >> >> >> >> I suggest we be driven by market share - aim for 95% market coverage >> within our segments... >> e.g. Firefox supported versions; Chrom* supported versions, latest IE >> version, Safari current version (because Mac OS X has a silly high >> penetration rate amongst open source sysadmins). > > > I think these sound like reasonable suggestions, we'll have to make an > (educated) guess. As we have a technical audience I think we can hope for > the latest versions and work backwards from there as bugs come in. > > I would also suggest we add whichever version of Firefox is in Precise and > maintain that for the LTS cycle.
There is no need for that - Firefox is updated in all releases of Ubuntu, it has a permanent SRU exception, because upstream. -Rob -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maas-devel Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maas-devel More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
