On Thursday, October 14, 2004, at 11:13AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>PearPC has been around for quite some time. There's speculation that 
>CherryOS has packaged up parts of PearPC into a nice GUI, but either way, 
>CherryOS is not unique. CherryOS may be "new" news, however, emulating 
>MacOS X on PC hardware is pretty old news.

I've been gagging for aproper GUI for PearPC for a while now, the one I have (PearGUI) 
is seriously flawed. As for the whole fruit thing...

>> Apple just cannot allow that to happen! *imagines world where Macs have 
>> Pentiums or Athlons*.........*shudders*
>
>http://pearpc.sourceforge.net/
> 
>> imo if having an x86 based version of OS X was a good idea then Apple 
>> would have done it themselves.
>
>They did. They alledgedly had it running on intel hardware internally , at 
>least initially. NestStep supported intel, Rhapsody certainly had an intel 
>port, and Darwin will run on intel hardware too..

Little is it known but the forst release of MAc OS X Server (1.0

They apparently (I've heard it from many sources - non confirmed) ran it on AMD 
hardware (in PC cases that were aparently wealded shut!) laterly, sighting AMD as a 
possible PPC replacement for the future, when at the time the future of PPC looked 
uncertain. When the G5 was presented to Apple and their preliminary tests proved it 
was a good enough CPU to power the next generation Macs then they probably scrapped 
the project, although I would not be at all suprised if, in the deepest vaults of 
Apple, there is a small team than maintain an x86 compatible version of OS X in some 
form, possibly with a reduced GUI.

>However, if Apple 
>released it, they'd loose all support from M$. No more M$ office etc. No 
>more M$ backhanders. M$ would nail them to the floor. You only have to 
>look at what happened to OS/2 and BeOS to realise that.

Apple have more leverage than IBM or Be as they have a long standing reputation based 
on their OS already and are not trying to sell something totally new on a 'no prior 
experience' basis. But yeh they'd still get panned by MS.

-- 
Mark Benson

http://homepage.mac.com/markbenson

-- 
Mac UK is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...

123Inkjets.com <http://lowendmac.com/ad/123inkjets.html>

      Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

Mac UK list info:       <http://lowendmac.com/lists/mac-uk.shtml>
  --> AOL users, remove "mailto:";
Send list messages to:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/mac-uk%40mail.maclaunch.com/>

Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com

Reply via email to