Thanks for this information, Mathias. :) On 18/12/2006, at 6:39 PM, Mathias Bauer wrote:
Clytie Siddall wrote:I have participated in a discussion on the releases list about changing the release interval to six months. What is the status of that discussion?The participitation in this discussion was not as broad as we (the release committee) hoped. As I see it we didn't face any relevantobjection. So we have planned to put the plan into action as soon as 2.2is out. Please stay tuned for an announcement (that itself shouldn't take that long).
This is good news. :)I wish I'd known: I could have used the time I spent writing those emails, in trying to finish my QA for 2.1. ;)
Did I miss this news on the releases list? I've been watching for any news of the release-schedule discussion.
I take your mail as a plea for keeping necessary(!) localization efforts out of the micro releases but leaving it up to each NL project to decide individually if they want to use the micro releases for some catching upif it helps them. This is in alignment with our (the release committee's) intentions.
Makes perfect sense. As Mox says, NLP projects with more resources may wish to put out changes in the point releases. My project won't be able to do much for 2.2, but I'll be happy at this stage to get QA done for 2.1.
from Clytie (vi-VN, Vietnamese free-software translation team / nhóm Việt hóa phần mềm tự do)
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/vi-VN
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
