Hi Johann, Am Wed, 9 May 2007 11:33:55 +0200 schrieb Johan Henselmans: > On 5/9/07, Johan Henselmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 5/7/07, Maho NAKATA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Please check following: >>> > I switched to JDK 1.4 from 1.5 to solve >> http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74906 . >>> > However, berkeleydb does not honor JAVA...I manually set a path at >>> > /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.4.2/Home/bin >>> > see http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54657 >>> > for details. It becomes a problem when we have multiple Java >> in one systems, and we >>> > of course should use Java specified at configure stage. >>> >>> For PPC, again, build was done on Panther. I have been facing >> build failure at >>> insteset_native project....But rebuilding again the problem >> faded away. So >>> there are two buildlogs for PPC build. >>> >>> Please do QA for them! >> >> Once again tested against databases connected via JDBC. This time I >> tested mysql and postgresql. Both gave the same error message, when >> started from Xterm, the moment I tried to open a table. Testing >> Connection and testing connection class went fine, also the opening of >> the database and getting a list of tables went fine. >> >> The moment one tries to open a table for viewing or editing, this >> error message occurs. >> >> ./soffice >> terminate called after throwing an instance of >> 'jvmaccess::VirtualMachine::AttachGuard::CreationException' >> ./soffice: line 236: 19663 Abort trap >> "$sd_prog/$sd_binary" "$@" >> >> In NeoOffice the opening and editing with the same database >> document goes well.
Ask them that they donate us their fix under an OOo compatible licence. Would be fine and we would finaly get something useful back in time from them. > Some more comments: it seems a recognized bug. > (http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75872), with a bug > fix. > > Unfortunately, the bug fix seems to be available only for W2K and > Linux. Perhaps someone knows how to get the (unofficial) bugfix in a > OS X build, so I can do some QA testing for the dutch version behind > this QA-breaker? You can do this of your own. You already found EIS and if you know about the buildbot on <http://termite.go-oo.org> you know that you can use them if you want a build for QA and you can even make install sets available. Those installsets may, in the case of MacPort 2 which is my bot, en-US and De or for most others only en-US but this should be suitable enough to verify if the bug still exists or not. If the bug isn't present in en-US and/or german chances are very high that it is fixed in Dutsch version too. But if you insist on a Dusch version you have to set up your own build enviroment and compile it. Since it is stated in EIS that the cws dba221a is integrated into OOF680_m14 I started a build of it. You can follow the progress on http://termite.go-oo.org/ and you can even download the install sets if everything goes fine. And btw please quote correctly on Mailinglists. Kind regards, Eric Hoch -- ## de.OpenOffice.org - Office für MacOS X, Linux, Solaris & Windows ## Openoffice.org - ich steck mit drin! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
