That's because in the top-level Makefile, LDFLAGS still has "-lproc".
At runtime, the linker is looking for libproc.dylib, although the
binary doesn't actually need anything from that library.

I've changed the Makefile to weak link against libproc. Try that.

Amit

On Jun 8, 8:33 am, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Amit,
>
> You are  correct, I'm on a G5 system. You are definitely on the right
> track, though I'm still having the same problem.  Whatever you did
> cleaned up a minor link error that I was getting in sequencegrabber (I
> had fixed it earlier by removing the -arch i386 from the
> sequencegrabber Makefile).
>
> So in short, I'm getting a perfectly clean compilation now from
> unmodified source (minus the deprecated QuickDraw stuff), but on both
> the downloaded binary and the compilation binary, I'm still getting
> the same dyld error.
>
> Chris
>
> On Jun 8, 1:50 am, Amit Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hmm ... you must be on a PowerPC system. procfs-1.5 has a feature that
> > depends on libproc, which (IIRC) is x86-only because it uses an x86-
> > only system call. I should have remember this earlier.
>
> > I've reorganized the code so that the feature (the /proc/<pid>/fds
> > file) doesn't get compiled for PowerPC. Either try recompiling the
> > latest source or try the binary for procfs 1.51.
>
> > Amit


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"macfuse-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to