I'm sure your intentions are great, but I don't see why you'd want people to go to yet another place for pretty much the same information. If our users strongly feel a need for a FAQ on a FAQ, they should let us know.
The more filters there are on information, the more distorted it becomes. At least in the official macfuse group, it's possible to oversee things and ensure correctness even if somebody misinterprets things. If you have satellite sites like this, doing that won't be feasible. I also want to clarify that I'm not involved in this. Amit Singh On Nov 14, 10:17 am, Graham Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.diigo.com/annotated/eeb89846bff0160f9eb8f5c1a6f52c54 > _highlights_ answers to some of the FAQs that occur most frequently. > > As > background:http://groups.google.com/group/MacFusion-devel/browse_thread/thread/b... > announces today's opening of a Diigo group that's complementary to the > Google Groups. Whilst I created this particular Diigo group with > Macfusion in mind, I see no reason why other MacFUSE-related > communities should not enjoy its benefits. > > The group is now open. Complementary. Enjoy! > > With thanks to Amit Sing, Michael Gorbach and all others in the > MacFUSE and Macfusion communities for their great and ongoing > contributions, > > Best regards > Graham Perrin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacFUSE" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
