Hi, I'm not really the best person to answer this as I'm just passing on what I've seen here, though I'll take a stab. My thought is NTFS-3G should work and I presume for VMWare Fusion (not a user myself) that it should detect a MacFUSE install and transparently use it as well. The issue is that the kernel module doesn't load due to the different word size however the user space components should work fine once this has been fixed (presuming compatible word size of those binaries with the client libraries).
Cheers, Sam Moffatt http://pasamio.id.au On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 1:25 AM, NikonMike <[email protected]> wrote: > @Sam: > > Thanks for your hint! Before I start fiddling with this, I'd like to > clarify what can be gained here. > > Will the linked 2.1.9 release of MacFUSE work in 64-bit kernel mode > with the current NTFS-3G (2010.10.2)? > > I'm also wondering if/how an upgrade will affect VMware Fusion - I > believe it also installs MacFUSE, not sure if it's a separate install > though. > > Thanks, Michal > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MacFUSE" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacFUSE" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en.
