On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Joe Auty <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey guys, > > I've written to the Macfusion author to see if he plans to build against > Fuse4x. Depending on his response, would integrating the Macfusion > functionality into the Fuse4x core be outside the project's scope? > Yes, it is outside of the Fuse4X scope. Fuse4X is a library, a building block for other filesystems, not a UI application. I actually think that bundling sshfs into Fuse4X is not a such great idea. It is better to have a separate package for sshfs. On Jun 15, 2011, at 6:30 PM, Anatol Pomozov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Rory Sinclair < <[email protected]> > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Very interesting stuff! Glad someone just took the ball and ran with it, >> so to speak. >> >> I'm currently in mid-development of a filesystem which i'm building >> against the MacFUSE Obj-C API, so I guess my two questions are: >> >> 1. Should I switch to Fuse4X? (I'm guessing 'yes' ;) >> > Yes > > 2. Is there still an Obj-C API? Is it the same? >> > Answers: Yes and Yes. Fuse4X has exactly the same Obj-C API. I did not do > any re-factoring/cleanup for this part. If you see how it (Obj-C) can be > improved it is time to speak up. > > > Also does it work on Lion? ;) > I don't know, I do not have Lion so I did not try it. Reports and > contributions are very welcome. > > On 15 Jun 2011, at 19:14, Anatol Pomozov < <[email protected]> >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Joe Auty < >> <[email protected]><[email protected]> >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Awesome! >>> >>> I take it that since sshfs is included here and it overrides the >>> /usr/local/bin/sshfs installed by MacFUSE that applications like Macfusion >>> will work under Fuse4X? >>> >> >> As far as I know Macfusion uses its own copy of sshfs binary bundled into >> macfusion distribution. So macfusion shouldn't be affected by Fuse4X. >> >> As for other tools that use /usr/local/bin/sshfs - they also should work >> the same way as before. Fuse4X has the same option names as MacFUSE. The >> only difference as I remember is that Fuse4X does not have "kill_on_umount" >> option. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "MacFUSE" group. >> To post to this group, send email to <[email protected]> >> [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> <[email protected]> >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> <http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en> >> http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "MacFUSE" group. >> To post to this group, send email to <[email protected]> >> [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> <macfuse%[email protected]> >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> <http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en> >> http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MacFUSE" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MacFUSE" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacFUSE" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en.
