Little update: OSXFUSE 2.3.2 has been released earlier today and addresses the Finder permission issue (option allow_other had been required in the past) and the deadlock issue on heavy I/O as seen with EncFS. OSXFUSE should now be on par with Bryan Pham's MacFUSE 2.2.2.
Read more at https://groups.google.com/group/osxfuse-group/msg/f6e0fc2a3b9c9974 Regards, Benjamin Am 17.08.2011 um 14:06 schrieb Kenny: > Since many users ask it in every possible thread, I'm creating this > one so the actual 'bug report' threads here stay clean. > > The status, as I understand it: > > * MacFuse, the original: > Latest version: 2.0.3? Dead, no more official updates. > As far as I know: stable on 32bit, but can't deal with 64bit > (Lion) > > * Tuxera's MacFuse: > An unofficial build of MacFuse, meant to fix the 64 bit issues and > provide Lion support > Latest version: 2.2.1. > Known issues: allow_other is required, deadlock issues on 64bit > machines with Heavy I/O. > > * Bryan Pahm's MacFuse: > A patched version of the Tuxera MacFuse above, including fixes for > the 2 known issues in Tuxera's MacFuse > Latest version: 2.2.2 > From my personal tests, this is the first somewhat stable build I > know of that has no serious known issues. > Downside?: source code not shared yet, which is a problem for some > users. > > * OSXFuse: > A fork of MacFuse, meant to keep a new project alive, and fix the > 64bit issues, ... > Drop-in replacement for MacFuse. > In my personal tests however, it made Finder freeze on startup > (had to force reboot with the power button) on 2 test machines. > Probably a good choice for the future though. > > * Fuse4x: > Another fork of MacFuse. New project, still under development, ... > Not a drop-in replacement, meaning you can run MacFuse and Fuse4x > next to one another. > Downside: requires recompilation of the suer filesystems. > My personal tests: got a kernel panic once, but not reproducible. > Probably also a god choice for the future. > > > Currently, I switched to Bryans' verison of MacFuse, it's the most > stable in my opinion, and the only 1 that fixes all the bugs I need. > Note that this can change quickly, once the source is released, .. > Tuxera/Bryans' version are 1-time patches, OSXFuse and Fuse4X will > probably live on and keep getting support. > > Post your suggestions, own experiences, flame, .. here. And please, > keep the other threads clean. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacFUSE" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en.
