Hi Nelson, Excellent observation. Although I would be one not to have a lot of faith in their ratings of digital cameras. Cameras are too technically involved. Same would apply if they did a review of personal computers.
A typical example of your observation would include the Nikon Coolpix 950. While it represents an older generation 2 megapixel camera, I'm sure it still outperforms many higher res cameras on the market today. However, higher resolution does extend one's capabilities to print larger without the image falling apart. Ward Oldham On Sunday, December 8, 2002, at 02:50 PM, Nelson Helm wrote: > Consumer Reports rated digital cameras last month. > > It reported that image quality did not always correlate with pixel > count. > > Nelson Helm > > The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will be January 28 > For more information, see <http://www.aye.net/~lcs>. A calendar of > activities is at <http://www.calsnet.net/macusers>. > The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will be January 28 For more information, see <http://www.aye.net/~lcs>. A calendar of activities is at <http://www.calsnet.net/macusers>.
