Yo.  I do understand.

One suggestion that may help a bit.  Since the spammers are now embedding
coded urls designed to test the validity of recipient addresses - without
being clicked on - I've started switching to "off line" mode before opening
items that may be spam.  It's too soon for me to be able to say whether it
makes any real difference or not, but it does make me feel better.

  Bill Holt

> From: Bill Rising <brising at Louisville.edu>
> Reply-To: macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu
> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 22:23:15 -0400
> To: MacUser Group <macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu>
> Subject: MacGroup: sleazy spam b#*$&#$#ds
> 
> Sheesh,
> 
> The most effective spam as of yet:
> 
> Subject: Your order N02-73622-657390 has shipped
> 
> Gotta check it out, just in case of id theft. Sho'nuff, it was nothing
> but a spam. Urg!
> 
> Bill
> 
> 
> 
> | The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will
> | be August 24. The LCS Web page is <http://www.kymac.org>.
> | List posting address: <mailto:macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu>
> | List Web page: <http://erdos.math.louisville.edu/macgroup>
> 



| The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will
| be August 24. The LCS Web page is <http://www.kymac.org>.
| List posting address: <mailto:macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu>
| List Web page: <http://erdos.math.louisville.edu/macgroup>


Reply via email to