Thanks, you threesome : Jerry, Ray and Russ, well there's work ahead 
for me in the New Year  about photos and prints. All I ever did was 
scan, perhaps crop, maybe fiddle  with brightness and contrast and 
print ! With my camera I just shoot, import and let the photos sit or 
make slideshow to run by my husband. Well now, with all your input, I 
am mov ed to delve deeper into this subject. So, while not 
understanding much of dpi and ppi, I at least know there is a 
difference. So keep on discussing and I keep your explanations in a 
separate folder for further reference
Marta,

On Jan 5, 2006, at 8:15, RWhite at neffpackaging.com wrote:

>
>
>
>
> LuAnn,
>
> Russ is exacty right.  It's the old GIGO theory/ (garbage in, garbage 
> out).
> Things always look better on your monitor, don't they?
> Where I work, we always have to check to make sure that hi res images 
> are
> 300 ppi.  A lot of folks confuse dpi with ppi.
> If i ever need to enlarge a scan, I take that into consideration when
> scanning.  If I want to enlarge a 3" x 5" to 6 x 10, I always double 
> the
> scan resolution to 600 dpi.  My scanner won't let me dictate ppi.
> If I want to enlarge a scan 4 times original size, I scan at 1200 dpi. 
>  We
> output everything at 2400 dpi/ 175 lpi.  That's when input vs. output
> reolution comes into play.
> Good luck, and watch those input resolutions.
>
> Ray White
> Neff Packaging Solutions
> 1700 Watterson Trail
> Louisville, KY 40299
> Tel: 502-491-1820 ext.330
> Fax: 502-491-7701
> www.neffpackaging.com
>
>
>
>
>                       "R. D. Preston"
>                       <preston.r.d at earthlink.net>           To:      
> macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu
>                       Sent by:                              cc:
>                       owner-macgroup at erdos.math.lou         Subject: 
> Re: MacGroup: iPhoto sharpness
>                       isville.edu
>
>
>                       01/05/2006 01:51 AM
>                       Please respond to macgroup
>
>
>
> On Jan 4, 2006, at 10:10 PM, LuAnn Johnson wrote:
>
>>
>> I edited some pictures with iPhoto, and sharpenening them just a
>> little made them look clearer on the monitor.  I then put 8-10 on
>> one 8.5x11 page in Appleworks drawing and printed them at Wal-mart
>> for a friend to use in scrapbooking.  The results are horrible -
>> everything is splotchy and grainy - the way it looks when I over-
>> sharpen.
>>
>> I printed them again on my home HP printer, and they are just as bad.
>>
>> The pictures look perfect on my monitor, so I don't know why this
>> is happening.  Could it be because I shouldn't have adjusted the
>> sharpening?
>>
>> When I've done slideshows on iMovie, I have always sharpened the
>> photos just a bit, and they look much better.  The pictures that
>> look great in iMovie look horrible when printed.
>>
>> Any advice or suggestions?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Luann
>>
>
> Hello Luann,
>
> Well, it's been a very long time since I've discussed this, but I'll
> attempt it
>   (albeit setting myself back a at least a decade) because my photo-
> application
>   of choice is Photoshop 3 ? now years old.  However, the basics
> should still
>   be the same.  As I see your described problem, it's just the
> understanding of
>   a key piece of the photographic/print process that you need.
>
> <: Resolution :>
>
> If you can, check the resolution of your photograph.  If you are
> starting with
>   a traditional photo, it is probably a continuous tone, and I'll
> assume you've
>   scanned it in.  Check the scanning software settings for resolution
> reference.
>
> Traditional photographs are continuous tone from lighter to darker
> shades,
>   have used some sort of screen in the bulk printing process to break
> up the
>   image so the printing presses and printers can print a facsimile of
> the
>   photograph.  Modern digital cameras refer to pixels, megapixels,
> etc., which
>   is roughly similar to resolution, but much finer.
> Many photographs found on/for computers have a 72 dpi resolution, by
>   default.  High quality photos may (should) have a much higher res.
>
> References:
> -- "D.P.I." (dots per inch)
> -- "L.P.I." (lines per inch)
> -- "P.P.I." (pixels per inch)
>
> Monitors have two kinds of resolution.  There are differences, but
> commonly,
>   monitors have a (device) pixel density of 72 ppi.  This is
> different from the
>   choices offered under the 'Displays' prefs (software), which only
> changes
>   what you see on screen, not the device pixels themselves.
>
> Printers print at certain resolutions, and may offer several
> different choices
>   of available screens in different *patterns*, and possibly dpi/lpi
> density to
>   choose from when applying to a photo to print.  When you see a 
> printer
>   resolution reference of 300 dpi, 600 dpi, 1200 dpi, etc., that's
> the general
>   resolution for print output.
>
> For decent quality output for any unaltered photo, you should have a
> minimum
>   of 300 dpi; 150 dpi is course, but can work.  If you are altering a
> photo and plan
>   to publish by printing, your picture should probably have a minimum
> 600 dpi
>   resolution.
>
> Internally, your photo may be a 72 dpi (course resolution), and when
> sharpened,
>   it will have essentially made the pixels *more* course from pixel
> to pixel.  When
>   you view these pics on similar monitors/devices, they look fine.
> Printing, however,
>   will amplify these differences, not improve them.  If you are going
> to publish to
>   CD or Web, monitors will display your images fine, but if you are
> going to publish
>   by printing, *start* with a relatively high resolution picture (300
> to 600 dpi).
>
> If I haven't been too terribly wordy, I hope this helps.
>
>
> Regards,
> Russ Preston
>
>
>
> | The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will
> | be January 24  at Pitt Academy, 6010 Preston Highway.
> | The LCS Web page is <http://www.kymac.org>.
> | List posting address: <mailto:macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu>
> | List Web page: <http://erdos.math.louisville.edu/macgroup>
>
>
>
>
> | The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will
> | be January 24  at Pitt Academy, 6010 Preston Highway.
> | The LCS Web page is <http://www.kymac.org>.
> | List posting address: <mailto:macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu>
> | List Web page: <http://erdos.math.louisville.edu/macgroup>




| The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will
| be January 24  at Pitt Academy, 6010 Preston Highway.
| The LCS Web page is <http://www.kymac.org>.
| List posting address: <mailto:macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu>
| List Web page: <http://erdos.math.louisville.edu/macgroup>

Reply via email to