Tony LaFima wrote: items deleted.... >I will agree with whoever it was that said digital was no match for >film, but only from a consumer standpoint. I don't think digital >images from the Hubble telescope use the same technology. But I >could be wrong. Many years ago when I was in the service, I got a >first-hand look at some really good film. They used it in spy >planes. A picture taken from several miles up could be enlarged >until you were able to see people on the street. Now that's density. >Based on that, I would have to say, the more pixels per inch, the >better the quality of the printed image. Only recently has picture >quality improved dramatically, due to the big jump in printer >resolution. Until a short while ago, inkjet printers were printing >at 300 dpi and laser printers at 600 dpi.
I think you meant resolution, not density. John -- U-2 and SR-71 Web Page http://www.blackbirds.net Those who would sacrifice Liberty for Security deserve neither -Benjamin Franklin | The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will | be November 25. The LCS Web page is <http://www.kymac.org>. | This list's page is <http://erdos.math.louisville.edu/macgroup>.
