I am still following you on this and I still believe it is a good idea. 
(Remember Beagle Brothers Software? The owners were not  programmers, 
when he and his wife started the company, just someone that wanted the 
AppleWorks of that time to do a particular task. They did it very well.)

On Wednesday, September 18, 2002, at 05:16 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:

> I meant more, having a non-developer managing an open source project 
> as a
> domain-expert/customer, and having them forcibly going out to interest
> developers.
>
> Seems to happen rarely in open source. It's why the best open source
> projects are ones that do something the developer wanted [ie they were 
> the
> domian-expert]. Referred to as scratching your own itch.
>
> Hen
>
> On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Jerry Yeager wrote:
>
>> No major reasons why it should not work, some of the most intense 
>> effort
>> at the moment (if you look at the on-going projects) is getting
>> Open-Source versions of commercial software, the two things can live
>> side-by-side as Adobe's PhotoShop and The Gimp have done.
>>
>> Jerry
>>
>> On Wednesday, September 18, 2002, at 04:54 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hadn't thought of sf in that sense, but I guess there's no reason why
>>> you
>>> couldn't open an account, propose a project, then look to hire
>>> developers
>>> through the help wanted bit...
>>>
>>> On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Jerry Yeager wrote:
>>>
>>>> Here you go:
>>>>
>>>> http://sourceforge.net/
>>>>
>>>> Toss 'em the project and see what they say...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                            Jerry
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, September 18, 2002, at 04:29 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmmm.
>>>>>
>>>>> Isn't there a website for people to submit requests for open source
>>>>> work
>>>>> to be done?
>>>>>
>>>>> I bet there's some open source coders sitting in a bedroom trying to
>>>>> hack
>>>>> out a web browser who would kill to learn of such an opening.
>>>>>
>>>>> They have a previously good product to copy, they have a market who
>>>>> will
>>>>> accept any product that gets relatively near, and even accept bugs 
>>>>> as
>>>>> they'll be more pissed at the previous company....
>>>>>
>>>>> Sounds almost perfect :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Hell... design the product and put your design online under and open
>>>>> licence. Nothing in the ideals of open source that says only
>>>>> developers
>>>>> can create software.
>>>>>
>>>>> Users should be able to design the software requirements they want 
>>>>> and
>>>>> put
>>>>> them out there waiting for a set of developers to be interested. The
>>>>> higher the quality of the reqs, the quicker the code mighthappen.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just an idea...
>>>>>
>>>>> Hen
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Bill Rising wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/18/02 14:19, Robert M. Klein wrote
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just for giggles, here?s an email I just received:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Robert,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We have discontinued support for our Mac product line.  If you 
>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>> at least
>>>>>>> one Windows PC in your office you can use Timeslips on that 
>>>>>>> computer
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> continue to use the Macs for data entry via our Timeslips eCenter
>>>>>>> service.
>>>>>>> You can visit www.timeslipsecenter.com
>>>>>>> <http://www.timeslipsecenter.com>
>>>>>>> for more information on this service.  I do not know of any other
>>>>>>> time and
>>>>>>> billing software packages for the Mac.  Please let me know if you
>>>>>>> have any
>>>>>>> other questions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> John Perry
>>>>>>> Timeslips Sales Consultant
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don?t have the thread in the group from a few months ago about
>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> billing programs for the Mac; it is essential that it be able to 
>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>> the same
>>>>>>> tasks and import all of my Timeslips data (11 years worth!).  Any
>>>>>>> suggestions?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Robert
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You should tell them that if there are no other packages, they 
>>>>>> could
>>>>>> have
>>>>>> a monopoly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyways, I checked out timeslips last fall and found it way more
>>>>>> complex
>>>>>> than any of the other timekeeping apps I'd ever used on the Mac,
>>>>>> which
>>>>>> are:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Multitimer Pro
>>>>>> TimeSlice
>>>>>> Project Timer
>>>>>> Time Track X
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't know the state of Linux time-tracking software, but perhaps
>>>>>> there
>>>>>> is something out there that could be ported to Mac OS X.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bill
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will be 
>>>>>> September
>>>>>> 24
>>>>>> For more information, see <http://www.aye.net/~lcs>. A calendar of
>>>>>> activities is at <http://www.calsnet.net/macusers>.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will be 
>>>>> September
>>>>> 24
>>>>> For more information, see <http://www.aye.net/~lcs>. A calendar of
>>>>> activities is at <http://www.calsnet.net/macusers>.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will be September
>>>> 24
>>>> For more information, see <http://www.aye.net/~lcs>. A calendar of
>>>> activities is at <http://www.calsnet.net/macusers>.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will be September 
>>> 24
>>> For more information, see <http://www.aye.net/~lcs>. A calendar of
>>> activities is at <http://www.calsnet.net/macusers>.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will be September 
>> 24
>> For more information, see <http://www.aye.net/~lcs>. A calendar of
>> activities is at <http://www.calsnet.net/macusers>.
>>
>>
>
>
> The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will be September 24
> For more information, see <http://www.aye.net/~lcs>. A calendar of
> activities is at <http://www.calsnet.net/macusers>.
>
>


The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will be September 24
For more information, see <http://www.aye.net/~lcs>. A calendar of
activities is at <http://www.calsnet.net/macusers>.


Reply via email to