Thanks for the help, Ray
George
On Tuesday, November 9, 2004, at 04:11  PM, RWhite at neffpackaging.com 
wrote:

> I just recently took the plunge into 10.3.5 Panther myself.  I was 
> running
> 10.2.8 with classic support.  It seems to run about the same.  I was 
> forced
> into it due to buying an Xserve sever and RAID.  I like being able to 
> label
> folders with different colors again!
>
>
>
> Ray White
> Neff Packaging Solutions
> 1700 Watterson Trail
> Louisville, KY 40299
> Tel: 502-491-1820 ext.330
> Fax: 502-491-7701
> www.neffpackaging.com
>
>
>
>
>                       "George H. Yankey"
>                       <jeffco13 at bellsouth.net>              To:      
> Macgroup <macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu>
>                       Sent by:                              cc:
>                       owner-macgroup at erdos.math.lou         Subject: 
> MacGroup: OS 10.3
>                       isville.edu
>
>
>                       11/09/2004 04:07 PM
>                       Please respond to macgroup
>
>
>
> I am running OS 10.2.8. with few problems  Are there good reasons for
> updating to 10.3 ?  If I do,  will I still be able to run some of my
> old classic programs that are behaving well on 10.2?
>
> George Yankey
>
>
>
> | The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will
> | be November 23. The LCS Web page is <http://www.kymac.org>.
> | List posting address: <mailto:macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu>
> | List Web page: <http://erdos.math.louisville.edu/macgroup>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> | The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will
> | be November 23. The LCS Web page is <http://www.kymac.org>.
> | List posting address: <mailto:macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu>
> | List Web page: <http://erdos.math.louisville.edu/macgroup>
>



| The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will
| be November 23. The LCS Web page is <http://www.kymac.org>.
| List posting address: <mailto:macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu>
| List Web page: <http://erdos.math.louisville.edu/macgroup>


Reply via email to