what's more, said firewall is turned off by default, even if it was  
turned on in your migrated tigger install. Block All Incoming  
Connections would be the simple choice for a single user, but then  
things rapidly go south. as i understand, apple is using an  
indeterminate black box rather than ipfw, so it doesn't configure by  
ipfw rules.

after a month plus of daily use with 12-15 open applications, i find  
spaces no more productive, and the zooming around tiring. when an  
unassigned application reverts to the space in which it was opened, it  
is a non-productive inconvenience.

asking mac users to configure a time machine lan in terminal is  
heresy, i think apple will fix that soon. i have time machine up for  
the experiment, but it certainly eats disk. 1.4G a day here setting on  
a 500G disk which might last a year and i'm a lightweight. my raid is  
still intact, but were i on a single disk machine, or generated large  
amounts of input files, i would consider other solutions. better than  
nothing and remembering it took more than a year to get 10.4 straight.  
best...jf

On Dec 8, 2007, at 7:17 PM, Lee Larson wrote:

> While the article was certainly written as flame-bait, I do think  
> the Leopard was given its freedom a little early. I'm using it on  
> three different machines and it's not crashed on any of them, but  
> there are some rough edges.
>
> ? The firewall, as it installs right out of the box, is a joke. It  
> took me a couple of weeks to get back the security I had with Tiger  
> because the IPFW interface apparently doesn't work the way IPFW is  
> supposed to work and the controls in System Preferences are both  
> confusing and anemic.
>
> ? Spaces is the right idea, but they should have looked more closely  
> at other virtual desktops. I've been using Desktop Manager under  
> Tiger forever and the virtual desktops built into Gnome and KDE in  
> Linux for many years. None of them have the annoying interface  
> rigidness of Spaces. I never find myself suddenly whisked over to  
> another desktop in Linux or with Desktop Manager just because I  
> changed programs. In Spaces, it happens all the time, and no matter  
> how I jigger the settings, it keeps happening. The desktops should  
> be more tied to windows than applications.
>
> ? Why can't Time Machine be easily made to work over a local network?
>
> ? Apple's desktop sharing seems a lot more finicky than other VNC  
> implementations. It took me forever to connect to my office Mac from  
> home because I had to tweak routers and firewalls. Making a VNC  
> connection to the Linux machine in my office from my Mac at home was  
> easy.

Reply via email to