Rick, I tried both and settled on Light Room, mainly because it had a feature that Aperture didn't (but now has!). They are both very similar, and both do a fantastic job. If one has features you like or need that is the one I would go with...
John On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Rick Burnett <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm currently trying to decide which os the best option for me. > I've got an aperture library set up with my photos in it, but there is > no RAW support yet for my new camera (canon T1i/500D). > > LR is not compatible with the T1i, and I prefer some of the editing > capabilities in LR. > The interface of Aperture is much better though, IMO. > > Anyone worked with both programs have a preference? I'm trying to > think long term here, as I question Apple's commitment to Aperture, > especially in light of the way that LR has been accepted in the > photography community. > > Thoughts? > thanks, > > Rick > > _______________________________________________ > The next Louisville Computer Society meeting will > be May 26 at MacAuthority, 128 Breckinridge Lane. > Posting address: [email protected] > Information: http://www.math.louisville.edu/mailman/listinfo/macgroup > > -- U-2 & SR-71 web page http://www.blackbirds.net Those who would sacrifice Liberty for Security deserve neither -Benjamin Franklin Blog: http://johnsstone.tumblr.com/
_______________________________________________ The next Louisville Computer Society meeting will be May 26 at MacAuthority, 128 Breckinridge Lane. Posting address: [email protected] Information: http://www.math.louisville.edu/mailman/listinfo/macgroup
