Pretty interesting stuff coming down the pipe here! I have a few comments about the (X)HTML generated by this tag from the layout/formatting perspective.
* I vote for the default layout to be vertical. Seems like most radio lists out in the wild are such. * It is proper to use <label> tags around all field labels. Doing this helps semantically associate the labels with the fields, makes styling with CSS easier, AND let's you click on the label text to select the radio button. * Using <br/> tags to make a series of non-styled <inputs> into a vertical list can cause trouble when wanting to apply styling to them. Would prefer to just rely on the <label> and <input> and format them w/ CSS or if absolutely necessary use a list style tag like <li> to wrap each option. Thanks! .jonah On Jun 15, 3:31 pm, Matthew Woodward <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all--we're putting the final touches on the 1.8 beta but I ran into > some aspects of the new Radio Group form tag on which I'd like to get > some feedback. > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to Mach-II for CFML list. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mach-ii-for-coldfusion?hl=en SVN: http://greatbiztoolsllc.svn.cvsdude.com/mach-ii/ Wiki / Documentation / Tickets: http://greatbiztoolsllc.trac.cvsdude.com/mach-ii/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
