> On 07 Jul 2016, at 07:26, Diego Molina <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> It works beautifully, with metric units, really sweet!
> 
> Now on to the 5th axis design to see if I can get this to full 5 axis.

Of course I'm curious, so if you've got pictures/videos when you're done, 
please brag about it and show us where to look!

Bas

> 
> Cheers!
> 
> 
>> On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 4:00:35 PM UTC+4, Bas de Bruijn wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On 06 Jul 2016, at 13:34, Diego Molina <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Bas,
>>> 
>>> That's all really clarifying. I'll sit by the machine with all this new 
>>> information and try to sort things out.
>> 
>> Good luck, if you run into trouble/strangeness then shout out.
>> 
>>> 
>>> In the future I'll follow your advice and try not to pollute the group.
>> 
>> Well, it is much easier these days to read the info you can provide from the 
>> web, where for example you can highlight a specific line of code. If you add 
>> a lot of text (or some people send file attachments) then the thread becomes 
>> very hard to read (and attachments are especially horrible opening/reading 
>> from mobile devices) and difficult to point at lines of code for example.
>> 
>> So the better to the point you (or anybody else for that matter) provide 
>> info, the better the chance for a successful answer.
>> 
>> Cheers
>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Diego
>>> 
>>>> On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 3:55:30 PM UTC+4, Bas de Bruijn wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 05 Jul 2016, at 13:27, Diego Molina <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 1:23:35 PM UTC+4, Bas de Bruijn wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 05 Jul 2016, at 10:56, Diego Molina <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Greating to all,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> So I've got a lot of cuts out of my 3 axis machine running on a BBB / 
>>>>>>> Xylotex configuration, now I added a 4th axis and am having trouble 
>>>>>>> figuring out the values to calibrate it and make it move as expected.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I've based my config around Xylotex.ini and Xylotex.hal example 
>>>>>>> configs, but to arrive at the actual distances on my steppers and lead 
>>>>>>> screws I had to lower the scale to about 20000. All the axes work as 
>>>>>>> expected with those settings.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The thing is, now I've added a 4th axis with a 20-to-1 ratio worm 
>>>>>>> wheel, and when I issue a G1 A90 F100 code (I'm assuming this is right 
>>>>>>> to ask for 1/4 turn?)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> don’t assume, be sure instead. Have a search thru the docs on the 
>>>>>> meaning of G1 A90 F100. Find out what units are used. 
>>>>> 
>>>>>   Is it steps/degrees? You know, I just ask after a lot of searching, 
>>>>> which in this case didn't result in any clarification on the matter.
>>>> 
>>>> look at your configuration for example
>>>> https://github.com/machinekit/machinekit/blob/master/configs/ARM/BeagleBone/Xylotex/Xylotex.ShuttleXpress.ini#L122
>>>> 
>>>> and
>>>> 
>>>> https://github.com/machinekit/machinekit/blob/master/configs/ARM/BeagleBone/Xylotex/Xylotex.ShuttleXpress.ini#L132-L140
>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> , for example, with the scale at 20000, it gives me around 10 turns on 
>>>>>>> the axis. When I try to decrease the scale I get to 400 and it moves 
>>>>>>> about right, but really slowly. I've tried to increase speeds after 
>>>>>>> that but without success.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> it all depends on the settings you use. Don’t upload your ini file here, 
>>>>>> but commit you hal and ini file to your repo and provide a link to that. 
>>>>>> We can’t see inside your head. read this: 
>>>>>> http://www.machinekit.io/docs/getting-help/
>>>>> 
>>>>> I've seen people here requesting the ini's, so I just assumed it would be 
>>>>> more convenient to just put as text.
>>>> 
>>>> nope, people specifically ask to give links.
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Could somebody please point me on which settings to edit, so my other 
>>>>>>> axes still work and the 4th can move at a decent speed at the right 
>>>>>>> rate?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> you need to do some calculating. find out 
>>>>>> how many steps per revolution your motor uses (200?)
>>>>>> do you use micro stepping, how much?
>>>>>> pitch of your leadscrew
>>>>>> ratio of your worm (1:20) 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> then you need to know the max amount of pulses that you can put out. 
>>>>>> find the step length and step time for your drivers and calculate the 
>>>>>> max frequency. This should give you an indication of what your motors 
>>>>>> and electronics can physically do.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> then look at the settings in your ini file for the 4th axis, and compare 
>>>>>> the max_velocity, mac_accelerations, stepgen_max_vel and stepgen_max_acc 
>>>>>> settings.
>>>>> My driver is 200 steps per revolution, 6400 microstepping (pulses/rev), 
>>>>> the pitch is 2mm, but how would I end up knowing the amount of pulses? 
>>>>> Step length and step time are both 1500.
>>>> 
>>>> calculate them.
>>>> 
>>>> for each mm of movement, there need to be 6400 steps / 2 mm pitch with an 
>>>> extra ratio of your worm of i=20 so you’ll need:
>>>> 
>>>> (6400/2)*20 steps/mm = 64000 steps/mm
>>>> 
>>>> both step time and step length define your max frequency. Look at the link 
>>>> above for the example.
>>>> 3 us (1500ns + 1500ns) means that your max frequency is 1 / 3us = 333.3 kHz
>>>> 
>>>> 333333 Hz devided by 64000 steps/mm means you have 5.2 mm/sec max speed. 
>>>> But your BBB is probably not set up to use this steprate. This is the 
>>>> physical limit with your settings
>>>> 
>>>> If you have the standard 10us task period then you’re even limited to 
>>>> 50kHz steprate. which means 50000/64000 = 0.78 mm/sec
>>>> have a look to the first link in this search
>>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/machinekit/max$20step$20rate$20beaglebone
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Diego
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io github: 
>>>>> https://github.com/machinekit
>>>>> --- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>>> "Machinekit" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>>>> email to [email protected].
>>>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/machinekit.
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io github: 
>>> https://github.com/machinekit
>>> --- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Machinekit" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/machinekit.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> -- 
> website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io github: 
> https://github.com/machinekit
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Machinekit" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/machinekit.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io github: 
https://github.com/machinekit
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Machinekit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/machinekit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to