On Wed, Aug 17, 2016, at 05:09 PM, Michael Haberler wrote:
> > Then, the very base of the 'TCL HAL bindings' - basing an API on the parsing > the output of a command interpreter designed for interactive use - is > hopeless; we might be able to patch things up given a detailed log but this > will work only so long and break again. I certainly agree with the sentiment above. However, I certainly hope that whoever implemented the TCL HAL bindings at least used the "scriptmode" option. That mode generates simpler, easier-to-parse output, and Michael as well as others have gone to some lengths to ensure that the scriptmode output is consistent even when interactive output changes. -- John Kasunich [email protected] -- website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io github: https://github.com/machinekit --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Machinekit" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/machinekit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
