I guess it would make sense from a kernel version standing point, not from the rt hypervisor though. As I remember, the idea of not moving to Xenomai 3.x was because it would support preempt_rt under the hood and hence machinekit would be better off migrating straight to preempt_rt and avoid the extra layers.
But hey, if Xenomai 3.x brings any improvements to any bone suffering from high jitters why not ;-) Fernando On Thu, Jan 12, 2017, 6:47 AM Matteo Facchinetti < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I just see 4.4.y kernel for Beaglebone patched by RobertCNelson with > Xenomai 3.0.3. > > https://github.com/RobertCNelson/ti-linux-kernel-dev/tree/ti-linux-xenomai-4.4.y > > that's ready to try using update_kernel script: > $ sudo ./update_kernel.sh --ti-xenomai-channel --lts-4_4 > > Could be time for Machinekit to migrate over Xenomai 3.x? > > In Beaglebone platform this could be a great opportunity to update the > older 3.8 kernel and pass to 4.4. > > What are M.L. opinions? > > -- > website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io github: > https://github.com/machinekit > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Machinekit" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/machinekit. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io github: https://github.com/machinekit --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Machinekit" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/machinekit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
