Hello, Looking at my previous post, I definitely should not be writing at 02.00 in the morning. But hopefully it is readable enough.
Investigating 2) I did not find how to limit announcement to a specific subset of IP addresses, but playing some more I realized that my listener found these Machinekit instances with string "_machinekit. _tcp. local". Given that found service (log) doesn't use TCP protocol, should it not be propagated with _ipc instead of _tcp? Cern Dne čtvrtek 6. prosince 2018 2:10:57 UTC+1 [email protected] napsal(a): > > Hello, > as project related to I started playing with Machinetalk - or remote > communications with Machinekit instances. If I understand it correctly > there are language bindings for Qt superset and Python, but I don't speak > snake or qt so my understanding from reading these sources is limited (but > I read them). So I have been playing with lego (building block of > Machinetalk -> , transport encoding) with hope for the personal milestone > of creating a desktop application (Debian and Windows) with DRO output, > jogging buttons and log readout using something akin to for connection. > (Desktop > app because these are easiest and one doesn't need specialized hardware.) > > looking at quite a minimal Machinetalk documentation I have of questing (and > probably will have a lot more, so sorry if you are easily pissed by basic > questions, but I will have them and this is said even after I read > Machinekoder's articles and watched videos on YouTube): > > 1) Given that every Protobuf encoded message can contain arbitrary > information (because of the use of Container message and the fact — which > I read somewhere — that information encoded in can be shared multiple > situations) is there any table which maps every Machinetalk service to > set of messages which can be populated in Container? I have been looking > at https://github.com/machinekoder/machinetalk-doc but I don't see there > for example which every message can over log connection. (For so far I > presumed that Log service can send and always have property of Container). > > 2) Playing with stock Machinekit installation I discovered that even > sim_axis run immediately start Zeroconf announcement over network. So > even when protocol is used. I did not study Zeroconf to know if there is > to limit only to certain IPs, as I can see that it could be useful for > running "remote" UI locally on Machinekit machine. But it is a bug or > feature? > > 3) In implementation of Machinekit as of today, is there the Server > implementation of Machinetalk or is there implemented the Client side > also. I am not sure if I am clear on what I mean but what I am to > understand and build is the Client side. And I am interested if Machinekit > installation as of today can connect to Machinekit instance and do > something on it? > > Thank you for your time. > Cern > -- website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io github: https://github.com/machinekit --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Machinekit" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/machinekit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
